Quicksilver RPC endpoints: free public URLs by latency
RPCsPolkachu
Leads204 ms
- p99
- 204 ms
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 4,318
Quicksilver Foundation
Trails247 ms
- p99
- 1.21 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 4,311
RPC latency
Polkachun/aQuicksilver Foundationn/a
Polkachu vs Quicksilver Foundation
Polkachu leads on the only live benchmark. Polkachu wins on Quicksilver RPC endpoints (204 ms vs 247 ms).
Polkachu
Community-run Cosmos validator and public RPC network. Operates no-key Tendermint RPC endpoints across 40+ Cosmos SDK chains (osmosis-rpc.polkachu.com, cosmos-rpc.polkachu.com, etc.) with archive support on a paid tier.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Polkachu vs Quicksilver Foundation: which one is better?
Polkachu and Quicksilver Foundation are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Polkachu leads on Quicksilver RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Polkachu or Quicksilver Foundation?
On the Quicksilver RPC endpoints benchmark, Polkachu leads at 204 ms versus Quicksilver Foundation at 247 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Polkachu vs Quicksilver Foundation comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.