Fastest free Ronin RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency
RPCsSky Mavis
Leads223 ms
- p99
- 324 ms
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 3,692
Thirdweb
No data in window
Per region
| Region | Sky Mavis | Thirdweb |
|---|---|---|
| US-East | 225 ms | 627 ms |
| EU-West | 222 ms | 628 ms |
| Singapore | 223 ms | 626 ms |
Sky Mavis vs Thirdweb
Sky Mavis leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Thirdweb on 0. Sky Mavis wins on Fastest free Ronin RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency (223 ms vs 627 ms).
Sky Mavis
Sky Mavis' official public Ronin RPC (api.roninchain.com/rpc) for the EVM gaming L1 (chain 2020) that hosts Axie Infinity, Pixels and a broader gaming stack. Standard EVM JSON-RPC, keyless, rate-limited per IP.
Thirdweb
ThirdWeb operates a keyless public RPC gateway at `<chainid>.rpc.thirdweb.com` covering 2000+ EVM chains via chain-id routing. Free tier is rate-limited per IP with no signup; paid tiers unlock higher throughput and dedicated endpoints. Used keyless across 13 chains on the RPC latency cluster (arbitrum, ethereum, polygon, optimism, base, bnb, avalanche, linea, worldchain, kaia, ink, opbnb + more).
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Sky Mavis vs Thirdweb: which one is better?
Sky Mavis and Thirdweb are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Sky Mavis leads on Fastest free Ronin RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest free ronin rpc, live no-key evm endpoint latency, Sky Mavis or Thirdweb?
On the Fastest free Ronin RPC, live no-key EVM endpoint latency benchmark, Sky Mavis leads at 223 ms versus Thirdweb at 627 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Sky Mavis vs Thirdweb comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.