SmartPy vs TCInfra

SmartPy leads on the only live benchmark. SmartPy wins on Fastest free Tezos RPC, live no-key endpoint latency (294 ms vs 594 ms).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
SM
SmartPy

SmartPy public Tezos mainnet RPC node (mainnet.smartpy.io). Open-source Tezos development toolkit; the public node is operated alongside their IDE and testing tools.

TCInfra logo
TCInfra

TCInfra RPC node provider for Tezos and Etherlink (prod.tcinfra.net/rpc/mainnet). Provides public keyless Tezos mainnet REST access with no API key required.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

SmartPy vs TCInfra: which one is better?

SmartPy and TCInfra are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. SmartPy leads on Fastest free Tezos RPC, live no-key endpoint latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, SmartPy or TCInfra?

On the Fastest free Tezos RPC, live no-key endpoint latency benchmark, SmartPy leads at 294 ms versus TCInfra at 594 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the SmartPy vs TCInfra comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.