Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains
BlockchainsAptos
Leads$0.0946
- p99
- $0.0970
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 14,800
Injective
Trails$0.4896
- p99
- $0.5020
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 14,810
Aptos vs Injective
Aptos leads on the only live benchmark. Aptos wins on Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains ($0.0946 vs $0.4896).
Injective
Cosmos SDK L1 with a native onchain orderbook and EVM compatibility layer. CometBFT consensus, sub-second block time, deterministic finality per block. TokenFactory MsgCreateDenom carries a flat 0.1 INJ governance fee on top of gas.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Aptos vs Injective: which one is better?
Aptos and Injective are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aptos leads on Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is cheaper, Aptos or Injective?
On the Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains benchmark, Aptos leads at $0.0946 versus Injective at $0.4896. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Aptos vs Injective comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.