Aptos vs Injective

Side by side OpenChainBench measurements. Identical layout, no editorial verdict, the live data leads. Each panel surfaces the aggregate plus the chain and region breakdowns when the underlying bench exposes them, straight from the Prometheus queries that drive the parent benchmark pages.

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 01 Jul 2026 15:08:13 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Aptos

Injective

Cosmos SDK L1 with a native onchain orderbook and EVM compatibility layer. CometBFT consensus, sub-second block time, deterministic finality per block. TokenFactory MsgCreateDenom carries a flat 0.1 INJ governance fee on top of gas.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 21 L1 and L2 chains

Blockchains

Aptos

Leads

$0.0862

p99: $0.0892
rank: #16

Injective

Trails

$0.4644

p99: $0.4755
rank: #20

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.