Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains
BlockchainsAptos
Trails$0.0951
- p99
- $0.0991
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 16,495
Osmosis
Leads$0.00117
- p99
- $0.00120
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 16,495
Aptos vs Osmosis
Osmosis leads on the only live benchmark. Osmosis wins on Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains ($0.00117 vs $0.0951).
Osmosis
Cosmos SDK appchain and the largest IBC-connected DEX. CometBFT consensus with deterministic finality per block, around 6-second block time. TokenFactory module exposes MsgCreateDenom with denom_creation_fee currently set to an empty list, so creating a new denom costs only gas.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Aptos vs Osmosis: which one is better?
Aptos and Osmosis are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Osmosis leads on Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is cheaper, Aptos or Osmosis?
On the Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains benchmark, Osmosis leads at $0.00117 versus Aptos at $0.0951. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Aptos vs Osmosis comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.