Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesBase
Trails1228.13 min
- p99
- 1788.56 s
- rank
- #14
- samples
- 61
Berachain
Leads7.50 s
- p99
- 9.95 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 1
Base vs Berachain
Base leads on 0 of 1 shared benchmarks, Berachain on 1. Berachain wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.50 s vs 1228.13 s).
Base
Coinbase-operated optimistic rollup on the OP Stack. 2-second sequencer block time, shared bridge with Optimism via the OP Superchain, fastest-growing L2 by TVL since 2024.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesBase
Trails1417.52 min
- p99
- 1792.35 s
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 51
Berachain
No data in window
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesBase
Trails90.36 min
- p99
- 764.82 s
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 631
Berachain
No data in window
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesBase
Trails25.85 s
- p99
- 59.50 s
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 186
Berachain
No data in window
Frequently asked questions
Base vs Berachain: which one is better?
Base and Berachain are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Berachain leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Base or Berachain?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Berachain leads at 7.50 s versus Base at 1228.13 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Base vs Berachain comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.