Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more
BlockchainsBase
Leads1.94 s
- p99
- 2.98 s
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 42,991
zkSync Era
Trails4.74 s
- p99
- 56.33 s
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 9,997
Base vs zkSync Era
Base leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks, zkSync Era on 0. Base wins on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more (1.94 s vs 4.74 s), Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.000242 vs $0.00182).
Base
Coinbase-operated optimistic rollup on the OP Stack. 2-second sequencer block time, shared bridge with Optimism via the OP Superchain, fastest-growing L2 by TVL since 2024.
zkSync Era
Matter Labs' zk-rollup with the ZK Stack reference implementation and a custom LLVM-based VM (EraVM). Batched producer with variable block cadence (p50 ~3-6 s) tied to proof generation rather than fixed sequencer intervals.
Side by side measurements
Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains
BlockchainsBase
Leads$0.000242
- p99
- $0.00230
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 40,314
zkSync Era
Trails$0.00182
- p99
- $0.00183
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 40,314
Frequently asked questions
Base vs zkSync Era: which one is better?
Base and zkSync Era are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Base leads on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest l2 block time, live across robinhood, arbitrum, base and 7 more, Base or zkSync Era?
On the Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more benchmark, Base leads at 1.94 s versus zkSync Era at 4.74 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Base vs zkSync Era comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.