Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more
BlockchainsBase
Leads1.97 s
- p99
- 2.99 s
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 42,751
zkSync Era
Trails2.57 s
- p99
- 42.07 s
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 16,732
Block time
Basen/azkSync Eran/a
Base vs zkSync Era
Base leads on both live benchmarks. Base wins on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more (1.97 s vs 2.57 s), Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains ($0.000343 vs $0.00254). Data as of 2026-09-24 UTC.
Base
Coinbase-operated optimistic rollup on the OP Stack. 2-second sequencer block time, shared bridge with Optimism via the OP Superchain, fastest-growing L2 by TVL since 2024.
zkSync Era
Matter Labs' zk-rollup with the ZK Stack reference implementation and a custom LLVM-based VM (EraVM). Batched producer with variable block cadence (p50 ~3-6 s) tied to proof generation rather than fixed sequencer intervals.
Side by side measurements
Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across L1 and L2 chains
BlockchainsBase
Leads$0.000343
- p99
- $0.0172
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 20,160
zkSync Era
Trails$0.00254
- p99
- $0.00258
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 20,160
Native transfer fee USD
Basen/azkSync Eran/a
Frequently asked questions
Base vs zkSync Era: which one is better?
Base and zkSync Era are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Base leads on Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Base or zkSync Era?
On the Fastest L2 block time, live across Robinhood, Arbitrum, Base and 7 more benchmark, Base leads at 1.97 s versus zkSync Era at 2.57 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Base vs zkSync Era comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.