Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesBase
Trails41.25 s
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 9provisional
Unichain
No data in window
Base vs Unichain
Split decision: Base leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (24.7 min vs 25.0 min); Unichain leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (57.97 s vs 1.1 min).
Base
Coinbase-operated optimistic rollup on the OP Stack. 2-second sequencer block time, shared bridge with Optimism via the OP Superchain, fastest-growing L2 by TVL since 2024.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesBase
Leads24.7 min
- p99
- 47.1 min
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 172
Unichain
Trails25.0 min
- rank
- #13
- samples
- 1provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesBase
Trails1.1 min
- p99
- 5.7 min
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 2,328
Unichain
Leads57.97 s
- p99
- 29.4 min
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 118
Frequently asked questions
Base vs Unichain: which one is better?
Base and Unichain are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Base leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. Unichain leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Base or Unichain?
On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Base leads at 24.7 min versus Unichain at 25.0 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, Base or Unichain?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Unichain leads at 57.97 s versus Base at 1.1 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Base vs Unichain comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.