Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesBase
Trails18.3 min
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 52provisional
Unichain
No data in window
Split decision: Base leads on Bridged TVL by chain ($8.31B vs $93.37M); Unichain leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (42.69 s vs 54.87 s). Data as of 2026-10-05 UTC.
Coinbase-operated optimistic rollup on the OP Stack. 2-second sequencer block time, shared bridge with Optimism via the OP Superchain, fastest-growing L2 by TVL since 2024.
Base
Trails18.3 min
Unichain
No data in window
Base
Trails2.7 min
Unichain
No data in window
Base
Trails54.87 s
Unichain
Leads42.69 s
| Provider | Bridged TVL | Bridged share | 7d change | 7d vs peers | Native | Canonical | External |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base | $8.31B | 50.9% | 1.10% | 0.70% | $8.01B | $3.12B | $5.19B |
| Unichain | $93.37M | 100.0% | 2.05% | 1.65% | - | $44.70M | $48.68M |
Bridged TVL is value secured by the chain's bridge, not value locked in its DeFi protocols; a chain can rank high on one and low on the other. The split is L2Beat's: canonical is escrowed on the host chain by the chain's own contracts, external came through a third-party bridge, native was minted here. Rows are the chains L2Beat tracks in its scaling summary; a settled L1 has no row by construction, not by omission. Size is not quality: a large balance says capital came, not that it stayed.
Base and Unichain are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Base leads on Bridged TVL by chain. Unichain leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Bridged TVL by chain benchmark, Base leads at $8.31B versus Unichain at $93.37M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Unichain leads at 42.69 s (provisional) versus Base at 54.87 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.