Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesBerachain
Leads7.50 s
- p99
- 9.95 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 1
Solana
Trails17.53 s
- p99
- 22.78 s
- rank
- #8
- samples
- 7,078
Berachain vs Solana
Berachain leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Solana on 0. Berachain wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (7.50 s vs 17.53 s).
Solana
Proof-of-History sequencing combined with Tower BFT consensus. Probabilistic finality at 32 confirmed slots. Slot time around 400 milliseconds.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesBerachain
No data in window
Solana
Trails1.3 min
- p99
- 2.8 min
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 21
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesBerachain
No data in window
Solana
Trails49.10 s
- p99
- 4.6 min
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 219
Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesBerachain
No data in window
Solana
Trails39.31 s
- p99
- 1.8 min
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 92
Frequently asked questions
Berachain vs Solana: which one is better?
Berachain and Solana are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Berachain leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on fastest wormhole vaa finalization by source chain, live latency, Berachain or Solana?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Berachain leads at 7.50 s versus Solana at 17.53 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Berachain vs Solana comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.