Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains
BlockchainsSolana
Trails14 s
- p99
- 16 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 5,759
Sui
Leads0.5 s
- p99
- 1.0 s
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 170,415
Solana leads on 2 of 6 shared benchmarks, Sui on 4. Solana wins on Highest staking yield, live validator net APR across 7 PoS chains (5.28% vs 1.43%), Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.000382 vs $0.00544). Sui wins on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains (0.5 s vs 14 s), Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains ($0.3582 vs $0.6963), Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (5.39 s vs 22.95 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (45.00 s vs 47.80 s).
Proof-of-History sequencing combined with Tower BFT consensus. Probabilistic finality at 32 confirmed slots. Slot time around 400 milliseconds.
Move-based L1 using Mysticeti BFT consensus over a DAG. Owned-object transactions bypass consensus via Fast Path. Deterministic finality under one second.
Solana
Trails14 s
Sui
Leads0.5 s
Solana
Leads5.28 %
Sui
Trails1.43 %
Solana
Leads$0.000382
Sui
Trails$0.00544
Solana
Trails$0.6963
Sui
Leads$0.3582
Solana
Trails22.95 s
Sui
Leads5.39 s
Solana
Trails47.80 s
Sui
Leads45.00 s
Solana and Sui are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Solana leads on Highest staking yield, live validator net APR across 7 PoS chains. Sui leads on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Highest staking yield, live validator net APR across 7 PoS chains benchmark, Solana leads at 5.28% versus Sui at 1.43%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains benchmark, Sui leads at 0.5 s versus Solana at 14 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.