Solana vs Sui

Solana leads on 2 of 6 shared benchmarks, Sui on 4. Solana wins on Highest staking yield, live validator net APR across 7 PoS chains (5.28% vs 1.43%), Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.000382 vs $0.00544). Sui wins on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains (0.5 s vs 14 s), Cheapest blockchain to deploy a token, live USD cost across 7 non-EVM L1 chains ($0.3582 vs $0.6963), Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (5.39 s vs 22.95 s), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (45.00 s vs 47.80 s).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h6 shared benchmarks
Solana logo
Solana

Proof-of-History sequencing combined with Tower BFT consensus. Probabilistic finality at 32 confirmed slots. Slot time around 400 milliseconds.

Sui logo
Sui

Move-based L1 using Mysticeti BFT consensus over a DAG. Owned-object transactions bypass consensus via Fast Path. Deterministic finality under one second.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Solana vs Sui: which one is better?

Solana and Sui are compared on 6 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Solana leads on Highest staking yield, live validator net APR across 7 PoS chains. Sui leads on Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on highest staking yield, live validator net apr across 7 pos chains, Solana or Sui?

On the Highest staking yield, live validator net APR across 7 PoS chains benchmark, Solana leads at 5.28% versus Sui at 1.43%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster on fastest l1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains, Solana or Sui?

On the Fastest L1 blockchain finality, live across 11 chains benchmark, Sui leads at 0.5 s versus Solana at 14 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Solana vs Sui comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.