Blockscout vs Mobula

Side by side OpenChainBench measurements. Identical layout, no editorial verdict, the live data leads. Each panel surfaces the aggregate plus the chain and region breakdowns when the underlying bench exposes them, straight from the Prometheus queries that drive the parent benchmark pages.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Blockscout logo
Blockscout

Open-source multi-chain EVM block explorer. Exposes address tags and public labels through its REST and JSON-RPC APIs.

Mobula logo
Mobula

Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.

Side by side measurements

Best wallet labeling API provider

Aggregators

Blockscout

Leads

56.9 %

p99
56.9%
rank
#4
samples
4,030

Mobula

Trails

41.4 %

p99
41.4%
rank
#7
samples
8,640

Per chain

ChainBlockscoutMobula
Ethereum40.7%53.2%
Base70.5%64.3%
Polygon70.7%52.9%
Optimism60.2%58.6%

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.