Jupiter Perps vs Mobula

Mobula leads on both live benchmarks. Mobula wins on Best crypto data API for token metadata, live across Mobula, Codex, Jupiter (66.9% vs 22.9%), Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens (97.0% vs 1.80%). Data as of 2026-11-09 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Jupiter Perps logo
Jupiter Perps

Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.

Mobula logo
Mobula

Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs. Its swap endpoint routes multi-hop across named pools, so it is typed as an aggregator on the quote benches.

Side by side measurements

Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens

Aggregators

Headline: All chains

Jupiter Perps

Trails

1.80 %

p99
1.80%
rank
—
samples
1,336

Mobula

Leads

97.0 %

p99
97.0%
rank
#1
samples
825
Quote coverage
Jupiter Perpsn/aMobulan/a

Coverage means the aggregator returned a non-zero output amount for the probed token. It says nothing about quote quality, price accuracy or transaction success rate. A high score means the routing engine found at least one valid path. Latency is measured separately on evm-quote-latency, and what the quote is worth on evm-quote-output. The token universe rotates hourly so the score reflects live indexer freshness, not a curated whitelist.

Frequently asked questions

Jupiter Perps vs Mobula: which one is better?

Jupiter Perps and Mobula are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Mobula leads on Best crypto data API for token metadata, live across Mobula, Codex, Jupiter. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is more reliable, Jupiter Perps or Mobula?

On the Best crypto data API for token metadata, live across Mobula, Codex, Jupiter benchmark, Mobula leads at 66.9% versus Jupiter Perps at 22.9%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Jupiter Perps vs Mobula comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.