Jupiter vs Mobula

Jupiter leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, Mobula on 0. Jupiter wins on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens (97.7% vs 73.7%).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Jupiter logo
Jupiter

Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.

Mobula logo
Mobula

Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Jupiter vs Mobula: which one is better?

Jupiter and Mobula are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Jupiter leads on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on best dex aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens, Jupiter or Mobula?

On the Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens benchmark, Jupiter leads at 97.7% versus Mobula at 73.7%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Jupiter vs Mobula comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.