BullX vs Trojan

Name: BullX vs Trojan OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Trojan leads on the only live benchmark. Trojan wins on Solana DEX volume ($3.72M vs $181.0K).

Read methodology Last measured Fri, 14 Aug 2026 01:23:50 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

BullX

BullX is a multi-chain trading terminal for memecoins supporting Solana, Ethereum, Base and other EVM chains. It provides token sniping, copy trading, and limit orders with a per-trade platform fee.

Trojan

Trojan is a Telegram trading bot for Solana memecoins. It provides fast sniping, copy trading, limit orders and MEV protection, charging a 0.9% fee per trade routed through pump.fun and Raydium pools.

Side by side measurements

Solana DEX volume: pump.fun vs Axiom vs GMGN vs Fomo, live 24h

Trading

Provider	24h volume	Protocol revenue (24h)	7-day volume	Take rate
BullX	$181.0K	$13	$1.47M	0.00007%
Trojan	$3.72M	$26.1K	$23.37M	0.0070%

Volume and revenue data sourced from DeFiLlama's DEX and fees APIs. DeFiLlama attributes volume via on-chain referral tags and program IDs; platforms without standard tags may be undercounted. Figures are 24-hour and 7-day rolling totals updated every 30 minutes. Revenue uses DeFiLlama's dailyRevenue dataType, stripping LP fees. Terminal volume (Axiom, GMGN, Fomo) and launchpad volume (pump.fun) use different attribution methods and are not directly additive.

Frequently asked questions

BullX vs Trojan: which one is better?

BullX and Trojan are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Trojan leads on Solana DEX volume. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, BullX or Trojan?

On the Solana DEX volume benchmark, Trojan leads at $3.72M versus BullX at $181.0K. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the BullX vs Trojan comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.