Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Solana
Trails8.43 s
- p99
- 16.92 s
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 8,598
Solana leads on the only live benchmark. Solana wins on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (32.50 s vs 44.06 s). Data as of 2026-10-11 UTC.
Proof-of-History sequencing combined with Tower BFT consensus. Probabilistic finality at 32 confirmed slots. Slot time around 400 milliseconds.
Celo
No data in window
Solana
Trails8.43 s
Celo
No data in window
Solana
Trails54.38 s
Celo
Trails44.06 s
Solana
Leads32.50 s
| Provider | 30d change | Stablecoin float | Net 7d | 7d change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celo | - | $111.60M | - | - |
| Solana | 0.26% | $16.34B | - | - |
Stablecoin float is where dollars are parked, not what they do. A chain can take in a billion that sits idle, and lose float to a single issuer redeeming. The figure is DefiLlama's chain-wide pegged-USD aggregate, every issuer combined; it does not separate a bridge inflow from a native mint, and a dollar bridged to an L2 counts on both chains, so rows are not additive. Read the net dollars with the percentage beside them: the same $400M is a rounding error on Ethereum and a doubling elsewhere.
Celo and Solana are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Solana leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Solana leads at 32.50 s versus Celo at 44.06 s (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.