Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency
BridgesCelo
Trails18.8 min
- rank
- #14
- samples
- 3provisional
Solana
Leads12.57 s
- p99
- 19.74 s
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 7,491
Celo vs Solana
Split decision: Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (13.96 s vs 45.45 s); Solana leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (12.57 s vs 18.8 min).
Solana
Proof-of-History sequencing combined with Tower BFT consensus. Probabilistic finality at 32 confirmed slots. Slot time around 400 milliseconds.
Side by side measurements
Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency
BridgesCelo
No data in window
Solana
Trails1.2 min
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 84provisional
Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery
BridgesCelo
Leads13.96 s
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 86provisional
Solana
Trails45.45 s
- p99
- 2.0 min
- rank
- #9
- samples
- 538
Frequently asked questions
Celo vs Solana: which one is better?
Celo and Solana are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Celo leads on Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery. Solana leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, Celo or Solana?
On the Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery benchmark, Celo leads at 13.96 s (provisional) versus Solana at 45.45 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster, Celo or Solana?
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Solana leads at 12.57 s versus Celo at 18.8 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Celo vs Solana comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.