Best crypto data API for token metadata, live across Mobula, Codex, Jupiter
AggregatorsCodex
Leads66.6 %
- p99
- 72.7%
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 48,502
Jupiter
Trails8.97 %
- p99
- 36.3%
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 18,652
Per chain
| Chain | Codex | Jupiter |
|---|---|---|
| Solana | 64.4% | 8.97% |
Codex vs Jupiter
Codex leads on the only live benchmark. Codex wins on Best crypto data API for token metadata, live across Mobula, Codex, Jupiter (66.6% vs 8.97%).
Codex
Onchain market data API for EVM and Solana. GraphQL and WebSocket feeds for tokens, pairs, trades, and pricing.
Jupiter
Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Codex vs Jupiter: which one is better?
Codex and Jupiter are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Codex leads on Best crypto data API for token metadata, live across Mobula, Codex, Jupiter. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is more reliable, Codex or Jupiter?
On the Best crypto data API for token metadata, live across Mobula, Codex, Jupiter benchmark, Codex leads at 66.6% versus Jupiter at 8.97%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Codex vs Jupiter comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.