Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized
TradingdYdX
No data in window
OKX
Trails0.14 bps
- p99
- 0.70 bps
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 2,880
dYdX vs OKX
dYdX leads on 0 of 1 shared benchmarks, OKX on 1. OKX wins on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.0029% vs 0.011%).
dYdX
Perp DEX on the dYdX Chain, a Cosmos SDK appchain. Orderbook with off-chain matching and onchain settlement, validators propagate orders via the mempool.
OKX
OKX is a major centralized exchange whose USDT-margined perpetual swaps settle funding on variable periods (typically 8 hours), with rates capped per instrument.
Side by side measurements
Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked
TradingdYdX
Trails0.011 %
- p99
- 0.0075%
- rank
- #11
- samples
- 2,880
OKX
Leads0.0029 %
- p99
- 0.0068%
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2,880
Frequently asked questions
dYdX vs OKX: which one is better?
dYdX and OKX are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. dYdX leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. OKX leads on Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized, dYdX or OKX?
On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, dYdX leads at -1.53 bps versus OKX at 0.14 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is faster on perp dex funding stability, 24h stddev of eth funding ranked, dYdX or OKX?
On the Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked benchmark, OKX leads at 0.0029% versus dYdX at 0.011%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the dYdX vs OKX comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.