dYdX vs Hyperliquid

dYdX leads on 4 of 15 shared benchmarks, Hyperliquid on 11. dYdX wins on Perp DEX security track record (1,091 vs 1,060), Perp DEX capital efficiency (0.706 vs 0.024), Perp DEX liquidation rate (0.063% vs 0.12%), Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026 (40.8x vs 121.8x). Hyperliquid wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.047% vs 0.076%), Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (3.00 bps vs 6.20 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($8.18B vs $79.42M), Perp DEX execution quality (0.0038% vs 0.12%). Data as of 2026-09-25 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h16 shared benchmarks, 15 measured on both sides
dYdX logo
dYdX

Perp DEX on the dYdX Chain, a Cosmos SDK appchain. Orderbook with off-chain matching and onchain settlement, validators propagate orders via the mempool.

Hyperliquid logo
Hyperliquid

Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.

Daily perp volume, head to head

Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.

Bench 266, all venues

7d lead

Hyperliquid

$446M vs $54.98B

30d lead

Hyperliquid

$993M vs $189.70B

Days led, last 30

0 / 30

dYdX / Hyperliquid

Current streak

90 days

Hyperliquid since Jun 27, 2026

dYdXHyperliquid

UTC days, one side per trade

05B10B15B20BJun 27Sep 24lead

dYdX volume Ă· Hyperliquid volume, week by week

The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.

0.8% · week to 24 Sep · median 0.9%

dYdX Ă· Hyperliquid, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day

0%50%100%median 1%11 Jun25 Jun9 Jul23 Jul6 Aug20 Aug3 Sep17 Sep24 Sep

18 Sep to 24 Sep

dYdX Ă· Hyperliquid0.8%
vs median-0.1pt
= dYdX volume$446.1M
Ă· Hyperliquid volume$54.98B
WindowdYdXHyperliquiddYdX / Hyperliquid
Last closed day (Sep 24, 2026)$99.4M$8.59B1%
Last 7 days$446M$54.98B1%
Last 30 days$993M$189.70B1%

Sources: dYdX, dYdX v4 indexer 1DAY candles usdVolume summed over all perpetual markets. Hyperliquid, Hyperliquid info candleSnapshot 1h over the main dex, base volume x hourly mean price; matches the exchange's own dayNtlVlm, HIP-3 dexs published as a separate row. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Sep 24, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading
ProviderFunding cost to hold a long 24hAnnualized (ETH)Per-hour rate (ETH)BTC hold 24hSOL hold 24h
dYdX6.20 bps----
Hyperliquid3.00 bps10.9%0.13 bps3.00 bps3.00 bps
View
dYdXn/aHyperliquidn/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

dYdX

Trails

0.026 %

p99
0.017%
rank
#15
samples
2,529

Hyperliquid

No data in window

24h ETH funding stddev
dYdXn/aHyperliquidn/a

Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Perp DEX security track record: days without a recorded exploit, live

Trading

dYdX

Leads

1,091

p99
1,091
rank
#3
samples
2,880

Hyperliquid

Trails

1,060

p99
1,060
rank
#5
samples
2,880
Days since last exploit
dYdXn/aHyperliquidn/a

This benchmark counts recorded incidents only. Absence from the registry does not prove a protocol is exploit-free: it means no incident matching the criteria (direct theft or loss of user funds via a security vulnerability) has been documented in the tracked sources as of the registry timestamp shown on each row. The registry is human-curated and updated when a new incident is confirmed. The registry date and source links are embedded in the harness.

Rolling 24h · Days since last exploitRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

dYdX

Trails

2

p99
2
rank
#15
samples
2,880

Hyperliquid

Leads

145

p99
145
rank
#1
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
dYdXn/aHyperliquidn/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

dYdX

Leads

0.706

p99
0.706
rank
#10
samples
2,880

Hyperliquid

Trails

0.024

p99
0.024
rank
#12
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
dYdXn/aHyperliquidn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Lighter, GMX, dYdX, GNS live

Trading

dYdX

Leads

40.8x

p99
40.8x
rank
#5
samples
2,880

Hyperliquid

Trails

121.8x

p99
121.8x
rank
#9
samples
2,880
P/E ratio
dYdXn/aHyperliquidn/a

P/E = fully diluted valuation (CoinGecko) divided by annualized protocol revenue (DeFiLlama dailyRevenue, 30-day trailing average x365). Protocol revenue = fees accruing to the treasury or token holders, not total user fees. Tokens without a CoinGecko listing show no P/E. FDV reflects total supply at current price, not circulating supply; tokens with large unvested allocations will show inflated FDV-based P/E. Updated hourly.

Perp DEX price to fees ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, GNS live

Trading
ProviderP/F ratioFDV / feesP/SFees 30dRevenue 30dFloatOpen interestFees / OI
dYdX36.0x40.8x36.0x$255.6K$255.6K88.3%$50.44M0.062x
Hyperliquid22.1x94.8x28.4x$75.42M$58.71M23.3%$8.38B0.109x
View
dYdXn/aHyperliquidn/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled

Trading
ProviderDaily perp volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
dYdX$99.40M$992.57M0.26%
Hyperliquid$8.59B$189.70B50.6%
View
dYdXn/aHyperliquidn/a

Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.

Rolling 24h · Daily perp volumeRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

dYdX

Trails

1.505x

p99
1.904x
rank
#8
samples
2,880

Hyperliquid

Leads

0.631x

p99
0.667x
rank
#4
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
dYdXn/aHyperliquidn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

dYdX vs Hyperliquid: which one is better?

dYdX and Hyperliquid are compared on 16 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. dYdX leads on Perp DEX security track record. Hyperliquid leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher days since last exploit, dYdX or Hyperliquid?

On the Perp DEX security track record benchmark, dYdX leads at 1,091 versus Hyperliquid at 1,060. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, dYdX or Hyperliquid?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at 0.047% versus dYdX at 0.076%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the dYdX vs Hyperliquid comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.