Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL
Trading| Provider | All-in cost | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aster | 0.051% | 0.056% | 0.074% |
| Hyperliquid | 0.046% | 0.047% | 0.057% |
Aster leads on 4 of 11 shared benchmarks, Hyperliquid on 7. Aster wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (2.84 bps vs 3.97 bps), Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.0026% vs 0.016%), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (586 vs 178), Perp DEX capital efficiency (0.731 vs 0.023). Hyperliquid wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.046% vs 0.051%), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($7.78B vs $1.68B), Best DEX for a $BOT market order, live slippage ranked (0.0020% vs 0.0051%), Perp DEX cost invariance (1.127x vs 1.204x).
Aster is a decentralized perps exchange (ex-ApolloX, backed by YZi Labs) on BNB Chain and other EVM networks, with a Binance-compatible API and 8 hour funding periods.
Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.
Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.
7d lead
Hyperliquid
$16.12B vs $48.59B
30d lead
Hyperliquid
$69.54B vs $191.74B
Days led, last 30
1 / 29
Aster / Hyperliquid
Current streak
15 days
Hyperliquid since Sep 8, 2026
UTC days, one side per trade
Aster volume ÷ Hyperliquid volume, week by week
The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.
33.2% · week to 22 Sep · median 37.3%
Aster ÷ Hyperliquid, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day
16 Sep to 22 Sep
| Aster ÷ Hyperliquid | 33.2% |
| vs median | -4.1pt |
| = Aster volume | $16.12B |
| ÷ Hyperliquid volume | $48.59B |
| Window | Aster | Hyperliquid | Aster / Hyperliquid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last closed day (Sep 22, 2026) | $1.83B | $7.02B | 26% |
| Last 7 days | $16.12B | $48.59B | 33% |
| Last 30 days | $69.54B | $191.74B | 36% |
Sources: Aster, Aster fapi 1d klines quoteVolume summed over TRADING perpetual symbols. Hyperliquid, Hyperliquid info candleSnapshot 1h over the main dex, base volume x hourly mean price; matches the exchange's own dayNtlVlm, HIP-3 dexs published as a separate row. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Sep 22, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.
| Provider | All-in cost | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aster | 0.051% | 0.056% | 0.074% |
| Hyperliquid | 0.046% | 0.047% | 0.057% |
| Provider | Funding cost to hold a long 24h | Annualized (ETH) | Per-hour rate (ETH) | BTC hold 24h | SOL hold 24h |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aster | 2.84 bps | 8.30% | 0.09 bps | - | 1.25 bps |
| Hyperliquid | 3.97 bps | 10.9% | 0.13 bps | 3.00 bps | 3.00 bps |
Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (1h for Hyperliquid and dYdX, 4h or 8h elsewhere); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.
Aster
Trails$1.68B
Hyperliquid
Leads$7.78B
Aster
Leads0.0026 %
Hyperliquid
Trails0.016 %
Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.
Aster
Trails0.0051 %
Hyperliquid
Leads0.0020 %
Aster
Leads586
Hyperliquid
Trails178
| Provider | Cost slope ($1M / $1k) | $1M fill rate |
|---|---|---|
| Aster | 1.204x | 100.0% |
| Hyperliquid | 1.127x | 100.0% |
Aster
Trails124
Hyperliquid
Leads142
Market count reflects the Mobula perp pairs catalog at query time. Only mainnet markets are counted (testnets excluded). Asset class tags (forex, stocks, indices, commodities) are assigned by Mobula's editorial taxonomy and updated when new pairs are listed. Venues not in the Mobula catalog (Hyperliquid, GMX, dYdX, Ostium, Vertex, Paradex, Aster) are monitored separately: their catalogs are crypto-only or verified crypto-only by native API.
Aster
Leads0.731
Hyperliquid
Trails0.023
TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.
| Provider | P/F ratio | FDV / fees | Fees 30d | Float | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aster | 25.8x | 74.3x | $6.29M | 34.8% | $1.45B | 0.053x |
| Hyperliquid | 22.8x | 98.1x | $77.61M | 23.3% | $9.06B | 0.104x |
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
| Provider | Daily perp volume | Volume 30d | Share 30d |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aster | $1.83B | $69.54B | 18.5% |
| Hyperliquid | $7.02B | $191.74B | 50.9% |
Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.
Aster and Hyperliquid are compared on 11 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aster leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. Hyperliquid leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Aster leads at 2.84 bps versus Hyperliquid at 3.97 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at 0.046% versus Aster at 0.051%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.