Hyperliquid vs Lighter

Hyperliquid leads on 7 of 16 shared benchmarks, Lighter on 9. Hyperliquid wins on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (1.91 bps vs 2.57 bps), Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($1.65B vs $893.90M), Perp DEX execution quality (0.0038% vs 0.0065%), Perp DEX cost invariance (1.217x vs 6.50x). Lighter wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.0021% vs 0.048%), Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked (0.0082% vs 0.030%), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (215 vs 179), Perp DEX security track record (1,227 vs 1,104). Data as of 2026-11-09 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h17 shared benchmarks, 16 measured on both sides
Hyperliquid logo
Hyperliquid

Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.

Lighter logo
Lighter

Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.

Daily perp volume, head to head

Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.

Bench 266, all venues

7d lead

Hyperliquid

$41.34B vs $18.93B

30d lead

Hyperliquid

$162.49B vs $69.80B

Days led, last 30

30 / 0

Hyperliquid / Lighter

Current streak

90 days

Hyperliquid since Aug 11, 2026

HyperliquidLighter

UTC days, one side per trade

05B10B15B20BAug 11Nov 8lead

Hyperliquid volume ÷ Lighter volume, week by week

The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.

218.4% · week to 8 Nov · median 401.9%

Hyperliquid ÷ Lighter, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day

0%250%500%750%1000%median 402%26 Jul9 Aug23 Aug6 Sep20 Sep4 Oct18 Oct1 Nov8 Nov

2 Nov to 8 Nov

Hyperliquid ÷ Lighter218.4%
vs median-183.5pt
= Hyperliquid volume$41.34B
÷ Lighter volume$18.93B
WindowHyperliquidLighterHyperliquid / Lighter
Last closed day (Nov 8, 2026)$4.24B$2.00B212%
Last 7 days$41.34B$18.93B218%
Last 30 days$162.49B$69.80B233%

Sources: Hyperliquid, Hyperliquid info candleSnapshot 1h over the main dex, base volume x hourly mean price; matches the exchange's own dayNtlVlm, HIP-3 dexs published as a separate row. Lighter, Lighter 1d candles quote volume summed over perp markets (market_id < 2048), zkLighter mainnet + Robinhood chain deployment. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Nov 8, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

1.91 bps

p99
1.79 bps
rank
#5
samples
2,880

Lighter

Trails

2.57 bps

p99
1.08 bps
rank
#11
samples
2,880
Funding cost to hold a long 24h
Hyperliquidn/aLightern/a

Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.

Rolling 24h · Funding cost to hold a long 24hRaw JSON

Perp DEX funding stability, 24h stddev of ETH funding ranked

Trading

Hyperliquid

Trails

0.030 %

p99
0.013%
rank
#17
samples
2,880

Lighter

Leads

0.0082 %

p99
0.022%
rank
#6
samples
2,880
24h ETH funding stddev
Hyperliquidn/aLightern/a

Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.

Rolling 24h · 24h ETH funding stddevRaw JSON

Perp DEX security track record: days without a recorded exploit, live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Trails

1,104

p99
1,104
rank
#5
samples
2,880

Lighter

Leads

1,227

p99
1,227
rank
#2
samples
2,880
Days since last exploit
Hyperliquidn/aLightern/a

This benchmark counts recorded incidents only. Absence from the registry does not prove a protocol is exploit-free: it means no incident matching the criteria (direct theft or loss of user funds via a security vulnerability) has been documented in the tracked sources as of the registry timestamp shown on each row. The registry is human-curated and updated when a new incident is confirmed. The registry date and source links are embedded in the harness.

Rolling 24h · Days since last exploitRaw JSON

Perp DEX asset breadth: non-crypto markets live, stocks + indices + forex + commodities

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

160

p99
160
rank
#1
samples
2,880

Lighter

Trails

90

p99
90
rank
#5
samples
2,880
Non-crypto markets
Hyperliquidn/aLightern/a

Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.

Rolling 24h · Non-crypto marketsRaw JSON

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Trails

0.020

p99
0.020
rank
#12
samples
2,880

Lighter

Leads

0.272

p99
0.272
rank
#10
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
Hyperliquidn/aLightern/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX token P/E ratio 2026: Hyperliquid, Lighter, GMX, dYdX, GNS live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Trails

87.7x

p99
87.7x
rank
#8
samples
2,880

Lighter

Leads

47.6x

p99
47.6x
rank
#6
samples
2,880
P/E ratio
Hyperliquidn/aLightern/a

P/E = fully diluted valuation (CoinGecko) divided by annualized protocol revenue (DeFiLlama dailyRevenue, 30-day trailing average x365). Protocol revenue = fees accruing to the treasury or token holders, not total user fees. Tokens without a CoinGecko listing show no P/E. FDV reflects total supply at current price, not circulating supply; tokens with large unvested allocations will show inflated FDV-based P/E. Updated hourly.

Perp DEX price to fees: what the market pays per dollar of trading fees

Trading
ProviderP/F ratioFDV / feesP/SFees 30dRevenue 30dFloatOpen interestFees / OI
Hyperliquid17.1x67.9x22.1x$86.28M$66.84M25.2%$7.31B0.144x
Lighter10.3x40.5x12.1x$6.12M$5.21M25.5%$507.07M0.147x
View
Hyperliquidn/aLightern/a

P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.

Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled

Trading
ProviderVolume 30dShare 30d
Hyperliquid$162.49B42.4%
Lighter$69.80B18.2%
View
Hyperliquidn/aLightern/a

Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.

Last closed day · Daily perp volumeRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Leads

0.163x

p99
0.412x
rank
#7
samples
2,880

Lighter

Trails

1.764x

p99
2.81x
rank
#17
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Hyperliquidn/aLightern/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Funding paid to hold an ETH perp long for 30 days, per venue, live

Trading

Hyperliquid

Trails

57.2 bps

p99
56.7 bps
rank
#15
samples
720

Lighter

Leads

53.1 bps

p99
64.7 bps
rank
#14
samples
720
Funding paid, 30d ETH long
Hyperliquidn/aLightern/a

Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".

Rolling 30d · Funding paid, 30d ETH longRaw JSON

Price to fees across DeFi: what the market pays per dollar of protocol fees

Trading
ProviderP/F ratiovs categoryFees MoMToken 30dFloatFDV / feesMarket capFees 30dRevenue 30dP/STVLSupply 30dSupply 90d
Hyperliquid17.1x2.67x--25.2%68.0x$17.97B$86.28M$66.84M22.1x$8.08B7.62%7.62%
Lighter10.3x1.614x6.49%-25.5%40.6x$770.26M$6.12M$5.21M12.2x$790.88M--
View
Hyperliquidn/aLightern/a

A screen, not a verdict, and not advice. P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama, trailing 30d x 365/30) summed across every fee adapter that accrues to the token. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers. A low multiple can mean the market expects fees to fall, that the fees were incentivised, or that the token has no claim on them. Read it with the float, the category median and the monthly fee trend, then do your own work.

Frequently asked questions

Hyperliquid vs Lighter: which one is better?

Hyperliquid and Lighter are compared on 17 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Hyperliquid leads on Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized. Lighter leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper on funding cost to hold a long 24h, Hyperliquid or Lighter?

On the Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at 1.91 bps versus Lighter at 2.57 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper on all-in cost, Hyperliquid or Lighter?

On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Lighter leads at 0.0021% versus Hyperliquid at 0.048%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Hyperliquid vs Lighter comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.