Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL
Trading| Provider | All-in cost | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperliquid | 0.047% | 0.047% | 0.052% |
| Lighter | 0.0030% | 0.0067% | 0.013% |
Hyperliquid leads on 7 of 16 shared benchmarks, Lighter on 9. Hyperliquid wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($9.79B vs $1.93B), Perp DEX execution quality (0.0036% vs 0.0084%), Perp DEX cost invariance (1.197x vs 4.69x), Perp DEX mark price fidelity (0.0099% vs 0.019%). Lighter wins on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL (0.0030% vs 0.047%), Cheapest perp venue to hold a position, live funding normalized (2.88 bps vs 3.00 bps), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (210 vs 178), Perp DEX security track record (1,182 vs 1,059). Data as of 2026-09-24 UTC.
Onchain perp DEX on the Hyperliquid L1. Fully onchain orderbook with sub-second matching, no off-chain matching engine.
Onchain perp DEX with a fully onchain orderbook on a zkSync rollup. ZK proofs verify matching, no off-chain sequencer for trade execution.
Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.
7d lead
Hyperliquid
$51.76B vs $14.08B
30d lead
Hyperliquid
$191.72B vs $39.95B
Days led, last 30
30 / 0
Hyperliquid / Lighter
Current streak
90 days
Hyperliquid since Jun 26, 2026
UTC days, one side per trade
Hyperliquid volume Ă· Lighter volume, week by week
The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.
367.5% · week to 23 Sep · median 792.2%
Hyperliquid Ă· Lighter, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day
17 Sep to 23 Sep
| Hyperliquid Ă· Lighter | 367.5% |
| vs median | -424.7pt |
| = Hyperliquid volume | $51.76B |
| Ă· Lighter volume | $14.08B |
| Window | Hyperliquid | Lighter | Hyperliquid / Lighter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last closed day (Sep 23, 2026) | $9.86B | $2.55B | 387% |
| Last 7 days | $51.76B | $14.08B | 367% |
| Last 30 days | $191.72B | $39.95B | 480% |
Sources: Hyperliquid, Hyperliquid info candleSnapshot 1h over the main dex, base volume x hourly mean price; matches the exchange's own dayNtlVlm, HIP-3 dexs published as a separate row. Lighter, Lighter 1d candles quote volume summed over perp markets (market_id < 2048), zkLighter mainnet + Robinhood chain deployment. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Sep 23, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.
| Provider | All-in cost | All-in at $100k | All-in at $1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperliquid | 0.047% | 0.047% | 0.052% |
| Lighter | 0.0030% | 0.0067% | 0.013% |
Hyperliquid
Trails3.00 bps
Lighter
Leads2.88 bps
Funding is signed. Positive means longs pay shorts, negative means longs get paid to hold. Venues settle on different native periods (hourly on Hyperliquid, dYdX, Lighter, Extended, Pacifica, Ondo, Vest, StandX and ApeX, every 4h on edgeX, every 8h on Kalshi, Aster and the CEX books); every figure is normalized from the venue's own quoted rate and interval before ranking. Funding is only the holding cost. Opening costs (taker fee, spread, impact) are the companion bench perp-fees.
Hyperliquid
Leads$9.79B
Lighter
Trails$1.93B
Hyperliquid
No data in window
Lighter
No data in window
Ranked only with 24 hours of funding history (288 samples) and a stddev above zero: a young listing, or a venue whose rate has not moved since listing (Ondo Perps at launch, Polymarket in July), reads artificially stable and shows as Provisional, never as the leader. Stability is not directionality: a persistently positive but tight band ranks above a rate that flips every settlement.
Hyperliquid
Leads0.0036 %
Lighter
Trails0.0084 %
Per chain
| Chain | Hyperliquid | Lighter |
|---|---|---|
| ETH | 0.0036% | 0.0084% |
| BTC | 0.0017% | 0.0048% |
| SOL | 0.010% | 0.016% |
Hyperliquid
Trails178
Lighter
Leads210
| Provider | Cost slope ($1M / $1k) | $1M fill rate |
|---|---|---|
| Hyperliquid | 1.197x | 100.0% |
| Lighter | 4.69x | 100.0% |
Hyperliquid
Leads0.0099 %
Lighter
Trails0.019 %
Per chain
| Chain | Hyperliquid | Lighter |
|---|---|---|
| ETH | 0.0099% | 0.019% |
| BTC | 0.038% | 0.032% |
| SOL | 0.024% | 0.039% |
Hyperliquid
Trails1,059
Lighter
Leads1,182
This benchmark counts recorded incidents only. Absence from the registry does not prove a protocol is exploit-free: it means no incident matching the criteria (direct theft or loss of user funds via a security vulnerability) has been documented in the tracked sources as of the registry timestamp shown on each row. The registry is human-curated and updated when a new incident is confirmed. The registry date and source links are embedded in the harness.
Hyperliquid
Leads145
Lighter
Trails38
Counts reflect each venue's live market catalog at query time, mainnet only. The asset class comes from the venue's own metadata where it publishes one; Hyperliquid HIP-3 dexes and dYdX publish none, so their symbols are matched against the crypto markets the other venues list and a fixed table of forex, commodity and index names. Tokenized gold (PAXG, XAUT) is a crypto token and is not counted. A market counts once whether it trades 24/7 or only during exchange hours.
Hyperliquid
Trails0.024
Lighter
Leads0.282
TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.
Hyperliquid
Trails0.50 %
Lighter
Leads0.028 %
Per chain
| Chain | Hyperliquid | Lighter |
|---|---|---|
| ETH | 0.50% | 0.028% |
| BTC | 1.67% | 0.19% |
Hyperliquid
Trails123.3x
Lighter
Leads92.5x
P/E = fully diluted valuation (CoinGecko) divided by annualized protocol revenue (DeFiLlama dailyRevenue, 30-day trailing average x365). Protocol revenue = fees accruing to the treasury or token holders, not total user fees. Tokens without a CoinGecko listing show no P/E. FDV reflects total supply at current price, not circulating supply; tokens with large unvested allocations will show inflated FDV-based P/E. Updated hourly.
| Provider | P/F ratio | FDV / fees | P/S | Fees 30d | Revenue 30d | Float | Open interest | Fees / OI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperliquid | 22.4x | 96.1x | 28.7x | $76.13M | $59.33M | 23.3% | $8.32B | 0.111x |
| Lighter | 19.7x | 78.9x | 23.1x | $5.45M | $4.65M | 25.0% | $614.52M | 0.108x |
P/F = circulating market cap (CoinGecko) / annualized fees (DeFiLlama dailyFees, trailing 30d x 365/30), on the DeFiLlama parent the token accrues from. Fees include the share paid to liquidity providers; P/S uses protocol revenue only. Low-float tokens show a much higher FDV/F than P/F. Pre-TGE venues are listed unranked with fees and OI, no ratio. A low multiple is not a recommendation.
| Provider | Daily perp volume | Volume 30d | Share 30d |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperliquid | $9.86B | $191.72B | 50.9% |
| Lighter | $2.55B | $39.95B | 10.6% |
Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.
Hyperliquid
Leads0.783x
Lighter
Trails3.13x
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
Hyperliquid
Trails82.9 bps
Lighter
Leads64.3 bps
Every row is a month of funding at the venue's average daily cost over the hours measured in the trailing 30 days (average x 30). A venue ranks only with 576 of the 720 hours (24 days) behind that average; under the floor the row is provisional, unranked, and shows its day count (the venues added on 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23 start there). Funding is signed: on a month where shorts paid longs the figure is negative and "cheapest" means "was paid the most".
Hyperliquid and Lighter are compared on 17 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Hyperliquid leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. Lighter leads on Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Hyperliquid leads at $9.79B versus Lighter at $1.93B. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Cheapest perp DEX, live all-in cost from $1k to $1M on ETH, BTC and SOL benchmark, Lighter leads at 0.0030% versus Hyperliquid at 0.047%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.