Enso vs Mobula

Name: Enso vs Mobula OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Mobula leads on the only live benchmark. Mobula wins on Fastest EVM swap quote API (353 ms vs 1.37 s).

Read methodology Last measured Mon, 24 Aug 2026 05:46:17 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Enso

DeFi shared engine that maps onchain interactions into composable actions. The Route API computes optimal multi-step paths across protocols and chains, abstracting approvals, swaps, vault entries, and bridges into a single call.

Mobula

Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.

Side by side measurements

Fastest EVM swap quote API

Aggregators

Enso

Trails

1.37 s

p99: 4.36 s
rank: #5
samples: 4,311

Mobula

Leads

353 ms

p99: 707 ms
rank: #2
samples: 4,320

Per chain · per region

Chain	Provider	US East	EU West	Singapore	Aggregate
Ethereum	Enso	1.53 s	1.50 s	1.49 s	1.51 s
Ethereum	Mobula	359 ms	356 ms	356 ms	357 ms
Base	Enso	1.22 s	995 ms	940 ms	1.05 s
Base	Mobula	354 ms	353 ms	352 ms	353 ms
Arbitrum	Enso	1.48 s	1.37 s	1.35 s	1.40 s
Arbitrum	Mobula	355 ms	352 ms	352 ms	353 ms
BSC	Enso	1.54 s	1.51 s	1.51 s	1.52 s
BSC	Mobula	352 ms	351 ms	351 ms	351 ms

Frequently asked questions

Enso vs Mobula: which one is better?

Enso and Mobula are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Mobula leads on Fastest EVM swap quote API. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Enso or Mobula?

On the Fastest EVM swap quote API benchmark, Mobula leads at 353 ms versus Enso at 1.37 s. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Enso vs Mobula comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.