Ethereum vs Sui

Sui leads on both live benchmarks. Sui wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (2.91 s vs 14.5 min), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (42.00 s vs 4.1 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
Ethereum logo
Ethereum

PoS chain using Gasper (Casper FFG plus LMD-GHOST). 12-second slots with deterministic finality every two epochs, roughly 12.8 minutes.

Sui logo
Sui

Move-based L1 using Mysticeti BFT consensus over a DAG. Owned-object transactions bypass consensus via Fast Path. Deterministic finality under one second.

Side by side measurements

Highest staking yield, live validator net APR across 7 PoS chains

Blockchains

Ethereum

Leads

2.53 %

rank
#5
samples
1provisional

Sui

No data in window

Honest scope. (1) `net_yield = gross_apr × uptime`. NOT "yield net of MEV", Stakewiz `total_apy` already folds Jito MEV into gross, MEV is INCLUDED. `mev_share_bps` exists for transparency, not subtraction. (2) Solana median is dragged by ~42 vals at 0% APY (commission 100% or zero leader slots). (3) Hyperliquid: centralised sequencer, no separate MEV layer, ~30 vals only. (4) Ethereum: one network-average consensus-layer APR from the beacon spec formula, execution tips and MEV excluded.

Frequently asked questions

Ethereum vs Sui: which one is better?

Ethereum and Sui are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Sui leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Ethereum or Sui?

On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Sui leads at 2.91 s versus Ethereum at 14.5 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Ethereum vs Sui comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.