Jupiter vs ParaSwap

Name: Jupiter vs ParaSwap OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Jupiter leads on the only live benchmark. Jupiter wins on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens (97.3% vs 10.9%).

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 09 Sep 2026 10:18:35 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Jupiter

Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.

ParaSwap

DEX aggregator and DeFi middleware layer. The Augustus Router splits orders across AMMs, PMMs, and direct pools on 10+ EVM chains to minimize price impact and gas costs. Also offers a developer SDK for integrating best-execution routing into dApps and wallets.

Side by side measurements

Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens

Aggregators

Jupiter

Leads

97.3 %

p99: 97.3%
rank: #1
samples: 1,238

ParaSwap

Trails

10.9 %

p99: 10.9%
rank: —
samples: 936

Coverage means the aggregator returned a non-zero output amount for the probed token. It says nothing about quote quality, price accuracy or transaction success rate. A high score means the routing engine found at least one valid path. Latency is measured separately on evm-quote-latency and solana-dex-quote-latency. The token universe rotates hourly so the score reflects live indexer freshness, not a curated whitelist.

Frequently asked questions

Jupiter vs ParaSwap: which one is better?

Jupiter and ParaSwap are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Jupiter leads on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is more reliable, Jupiter or ParaSwap?

On the Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens benchmark, Jupiter leads at 97.3% versus ParaSwap at 10.9%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Jupiter vs ParaSwap comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

Jupiter vs Mobula

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.