Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens
AggregatorsJupiter
No data in window
ParaSwap
No data in window
Jupiter vs ParaSwap
Jupiter leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks, ParaSwap on 0. Jupiter wins on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens (94.9% vs 13.2%).
Jupiter
Solana swap aggregator. REST APIs for quotes, swap routing, price, and token lists across Solana DEXs.
ParaSwap
DEX aggregator and DeFi middleware layer. The Augustus Router splits orders across AMMs, PMMs, and direct pools on 10+ EVM chains to minimize price impact and gas costs. Also offers a developer SDK for integrating best-execution routing into dApps and wallets.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Jupiter vs ParaSwap: which one is better?
Jupiter and ParaSwap are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Jupiter leads on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on best dex aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens, Jupiter or ParaSwap?
On the Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens benchmark, Jupiter leads at 94.9% versus ParaSwap at 13.2%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Jupiter vs ParaSwap comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.