Mobula vs OLI

Name: Mobula vs OLI OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

OLI leads on the only live benchmark. OLI wins on Best wallet labeling API provider (50.3% vs 44.2%).

Read methodology Last measured Sat, 22 Aug 2026 02:14:56 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Mobula

Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.

OLI

Open Labels Initiative, a community standard and shared dataset for EVM address labels. Distributes labels via GitHub and a public API.

Side by side measurements

Best wallet labeling API provider

Aggregators

Mobula

Trails

44.2 %

p99: 44.2%
rank: #6
samples: 8,640

OLI

Leads

50.3 %

p99: 50.3%
rank: #4
samples: 5,579

Per chain

Chain	Mobula	OLI
Ethereum	62.5%	77.8%
BNB Chain	79.9%	13.2%
Base	64.9%	41.3%
Arbitrum	46.7%	47.1%
Polygon	58.2%	41.2%
Optimism	64.4%	53.0%

Coverage means the provider returned a non-empty label for the probed address, it says nothing about label quality or correctness. Read the EOA vs contract split before concluding: a provider can look strong overall while only labeling contracts (verified-source names) and missing every wallet. The Success column is fetch reliability (share of API calls that did not error), not labeling accuracy.

Frequently asked questions

Mobula vs OLI: which one is better?

Mobula and OLI are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. OLI leads on Best wallet labeling API provider. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is more reliable, Mobula or OLI?

On the Best wallet labeling API provider benchmark, OLI leads at 50.3% versus Mobula at 44.2%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Mobula vs OLI comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.