Mobula vs Oli

Side by side OpenChainBench measurements. Identical layout, no editorial verdict, the live data leads. Each panel surfaces the aggregate plus the chain and region breakdowns when the underlying bench exposes them, straight from the Prometheus queries that drive the parent benchmark pages.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark
Mobula logo
Mobula

Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.

Oli logo
Oli

Open Labels Initiative, a community standard and shared dataset for EVM address labels. Distributes labels via GitHub and a public API.

Side by side measurements

Best wallet labeling API provider

Aggregators

Mobula

Trails

41.4 %

p99
41.4%
rank
#7
samples
8,640

Oli

Leads

50.5 %

p99
50.5%
rank
#5
samples
5,583

Per chain

ChainMobulaOli
Ethereum53.1%78.2%
BNB Chain80.3%13.4%
Base64.2%41.3%
Arbitrum47.2%47.3%
Polygon52.9%41.2%
Optimism58.6%53.0%

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.