Mobula vs TonAPI

Side by side OpenChainBench measurements. Identical layout, no editorial verdict, the live data leads. Each panel surfaces the aggregate plus the chain and region breakdowns when the underlying bench exposes them, straight from the Prometheus queries that drive the parent benchmark pages.

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 01 Jul 2026 15:15:28 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Mobula

Onchain data aggregator covering 80+ chains. WebSocket fast-trade feed, REST market and metadata, wallet portfolio APIs.

TonAPI

REST API for the Gram (TON) blockchain. Returns account metadata, known entity names, and address book labels for Gram wallets.

Side by side measurements

Best wallet labeling API provider

Aggregators

Mobula

Leads

41.4 %

p99: 41.4%
rank: #7
samples: 8,640

TonAPI

Trails

35.8 %

p99: 35.8%
rank: #8
samples: 681

Per chain

Chain	Mobula	TonAPI
Gram	12.5%	35.7%

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.