Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens
AggregatorsParaSwap
No data in window
Relay
No data in window
Per chain
| Chain | ParaSwap | Relay |
|---|---|---|
| BNB | 23.1% | 40.3% |
ParaSwap vs Relay
ParaSwap leads on 0 of 1 shared benchmarks, Relay on 1. Relay wins on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens (33.1% vs 13.2%).
ParaSwap
DEX aggregator and DeFi middleware layer. The Augustus Router splits orders across AMMs, PMMs, and direct pools on 10+ EVM chains to minimize price impact and gas costs. Also offers a developer SDK for integrating best-execution routing into dApps and wallets.
Relay
Cross-chain intent network from Reservoir. Users sign an intent, relayers compete to fill on the destination, settlement is typically sub-30 seconds.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
ParaSwap vs Relay: which one is better?
ParaSwap and Relay are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Relay leads on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on best dex aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens, ParaSwap or Relay?
On the Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens benchmark, Relay leads at 33.1% versus ParaSwap at 13.2%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the ParaSwap vs Relay comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.