ParaSwap vs Relay

Name: ParaSwap vs Relay OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Relay leads on the only live benchmark. Relay wins on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens (23.9% vs 10.9%).

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 09 Sep 2026 10:33:35 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

ParaSwap

DEX aggregator and DeFi middleware layer. The Augustus Router splits orders across AMMs, PMMs, and direct pools on 10+ EVM chains to minimize price impact and gas costs. Also offers a developer SDK for integrating best-execution routing into dApps and wallets.

Relay

Cross-chain intent network from Reservoir. Users sign an intent, relayers compete to fill on the destination, settlement is typically sub-30 seconds.

Side by side measurements

Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens

Aggregators

ParaSwap

Trails

10.9 %

p99: 10.9%
rank: —
samples: 936

Relay

Leads

23.9 %

p99: 23.9%
rank: —
samples: 2,175

Per chain

Chain	ParaSwap	Relay
BNB	36.4%	37.3%
Robinhood	1.88%	49.9%

Coverage means the aggregator returned a non-zero output amount for the probed token. It says nothing about quote quality, price accuracy or transaction success rate. A high score means the routing engine found at least one valid path. Latency is measured separately on evm-quote-latency and solana-dex-quote-latency. The token universe rotates hourly so the score reflects live indexer freshness, not a curated whitelist.

Frequently asked questions

ParaSwap vs Relay: which one is better?

ParaSwap and Relay are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Relay leads on Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is more reliable, ParaSwap or Relay?

On the Best DEX aggregator for quoting newly-launched tokens benchmark, Relay leads at 23.9% versus ParaSwap at 10.9%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the ParaSwap vs Relay comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.