deBridge leads on 1 of 2 shared benchmarks, Relay on 1. deBridge wins on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (366 ms vs 958 ms). Relay wins on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (2.61% vs 17.2%).
Cross-chain intent protocol using the DLN solver network. Liquidity is filled by solvers on the destination chain, no wrapped assets or LP pools.
Cross-chain intent network from Reservoir. Users sign an intent, relayers compete to fill on the destination, settlement is typically sub-30 seconds.
deBridge
Leads366 ms
Relay
Trails958 ms
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | US-East | Singapore | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | deBridge | 291 ms | 446 ms | 453 ms | 368 ms |
| Relay | 1.08 s | 1.16 s | 1.10 s | 1.10 s | |
| Base to Arb | deBridge | 352 ms | 428 ms | 429 ms | 381 ms |
| Relay | 743 ms | 819 ms | 793 ms | 769 ms | |
| Arb to Sol | deBridge | 282 ms | 403 ms | 403 ms | 341 ms |
| Relay | 1.42 s | 1.40 s | 1.35 s | 1.40 s |
deBridge
Trails17.2 %
Relay
Leads2.61 %
Per chain
| Chain | deBridge | Relay |
|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | 15.0% | 0.18% |
| Base to Arb | 16.5% | 0.22% |
| Arb to Sol | 20.2% | 1.12% |
deBridge and Relay are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. deBridge leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. Relay leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, deBridge leads at 366 ms versus Relay at 958 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional benchmark, Relay leads at 2.61% versus deBridge at 17.2%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.