Relay leads on the only live benchmark. Relay wins on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (0.18% vs 0.91%).
Cross-chain intent protocol using the DLN solver network. Liquidity is filled by solvers on the destination chain, no wrapped assets or LP pools.
Cross-chain intent network from Reservoir. Users sign an intent, relayers compete to fill on the destination, settlement is typically sub-30 seconds.
deBridge
No data in window
Relay
Trails490 ms
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | US-East | Singapore | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | deBridge | 141 ms | 404 ms | 522 ms | 141 ms |
| Relay | 1.03 s | 1.05 s | 1.07 s | 1.23 s | |
| Base to Arb | deBridge | 163 ms | 370 ms | 378 ms | 370 ms |
| Relay | 421 ms | 628 ms | 627 ms | 444 ms | |
| Arb to Sol | deBridge | 175 ms | 367 ms | 366 ms | 367 ms |
| Relay | 733 ms | 791 ms | 777 ms | 733 ms |
deBridge
Trails0.91 %
Relay
Leads0.18 %
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | US-East | Singapore | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | deBridge | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Relay | 0.030% | 0.029% | 0.029% | 0.029% | |
| Base to Arb | deBridge | 0.88% | 0.88% | 0.88% | 0.88% |
| Relay | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
| Arb to Sol | deBridge | 1.11% | 1.11% | 1.11% | 1.11% |
| Relay | 0.15% | 0.15% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
deBridge and Relay are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Relay leads on Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional benchmark, Relay leads at 0.18% versus deBridge at 0.91%. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.