Axiom vs Pepeboost

Axiom leads on both live benchmarks. Axiom wins on Trading app daily volume 2026 ($112.49M vs $73.6K), Trading terminal fill quality 2026 (405 bps vs 546 bps). Data as of 2026-09-25 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Axiom logo
Axiom

Axiom is a Solana-native trading terminal expanding to Hyperliquid perps with a registered builder code, focused on advanced order types and pro-trader UX.

Side by side measurements

Trading app daily volume 2026: GMGN, Axiom, FOMO, Terminal, Photon, Trojan by UTC day, every chain

Trading
ProviderDaily volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
Axiom$112.49M$2.74B15.1%
Pepeboostprovisional$73.6K$5.62M0.031%
View
Axiomn/aPepeboostn/a

Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama adapter attributes to the app per UTC day, over every chain the adapter covers: FOMO is Solana only on DeFiLlama, GMGN spans ten chains. Each row ends on the app's latest closed day: most adapters are Dune queries that publish a day 10 to 20 hours after it closes, so before mid-day UTC some rows are dated one day behind, and GMGN's adapter skips some days. DeFiLlama can restate the last day for about a day; the series is re-read hourly.

Trading terminal fill quality 2026: what a swap costs on Axiom, GMGN, FOMO, Photon, Trojan, measured on-chain

Trading
ProviderCost per swapTerminal feeNetworkPoolFailed swaps
Axiom405 bps93.7 bps25.4 bps132 bps4.79%
Pepeboostprovisional546 bps97.2 bps85.0 bps43.5 bps4.93%
View
Axiomn/aPepeboostn/a

Random sample (150 a day per row, Solana and EVM alike) of the swaps each terminal routed, every attempt counted for the fail rate. Reference = the pool's state before the swap (its reserves, or the previous trade within 60 s); swaps without one keep their split, no loss figure. Published from 50 priced swaps pooled over the product's chains at 25 or more (a single-chain product from 25), ranked from 100; the median's 95 % interval is in the JSON. Compare medians, not single swaps.

Frequently asked questions

Axiom vs Pepeboost: which one is better?

Axiom and Pepeboost are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Axiom leads on Trading app daily volume 2026. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher daily volume, Axiom or Pepeboost?

On the Trading app daily volume 2026 benchmark, Axiom leads at $112.49M versus Pepeboost at $73.6K (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Axiom vs Pepeboost comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.