Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard
Trading| Provider | Volume routed | Users 24h | Effective fee bps | Time since last fill |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axiom | $7.29M | 202 | 0.0100% | 31.1 s |
| Phantom | $82.69M | 2,733 | 0.055% | 11.6 s |
Axiom vs Phantom
Axiom leads on 0 of 1 shared benchmarks, Phantom on 1. Phantom wins on Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard ($45.2K vs $730.35).
Axiom
Axiom is a Solana-native trading terminal expanding to Hyperliquid perps with a registered builder code, focused on advanced order types and pro-trader UX.
Phantom
Phantom is the leading multi-chain crypto wallet on Solana, Ethereum, and Bitcoin; its Hyperliquid perps tab routes orders with a registered builder code so users trade HL directly from the wallet UI.
Side by side measurements
Frequently asked questions
Axiom vs Phantom: which one is better?
Axiom and Phantom are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Phantom leads on Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster on hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard, Axiom or Phantom?
On the Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard benchmark, Phantom leads at $45.2K versus Axiom at $730.35. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Axiom vs Phantom comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.