Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains
BlockchainsBase
Leads$0.000247
- p99
- $0.00306
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 40,317
Solana
Trails$0.000382
- p99
- $0.000383
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 40,317
Base leads on 2 of 5 shared benchmarks, Solana on 3. Base wins on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.000247 vs $0.000382), Fastest Hyperlane source chain by end-to-end message delivery (23.34 s vs 42.19 s). Solana wins on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (19.54 s vs 20.6 min), Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (1.4 min vs 25.0 min), Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (48.35 s vs 1.1 min).
Coinbase-operated optimistic rollup on the OP Stack. 2-second sequencer block time, shared bridge with Optimism via the OP Superchain, fastest-growing L2 by TVL since 2024.
Proof-of-History sequencing combined with Tower BFT consensus. Probabilistic finality at 32 confirmed slots. Slot time around 400 milliseconds.
Base
Leads$0.000247
Solana
Trails$0.000382
Base
Trails20.6 min
Solana
Leads19.54 s
Base
Trails25.0 min
Solana
Leads1.4 min
Base
Trails1.1 min
Solana
Leads48.35 s
Base
Leads23.34 s
Solana
Trails42.19 s
Base and Solana are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Base leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. Solana leads on Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Base leads at $0.000247 versus Solana at $0.000382. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency benchmark, Solana leads at 19.54 s versus Base at 20.6 min. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.