Base vs Solana

Split decision: Base leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains ($0.000305 vs $0.000486) and Fastest Wormhole VAA finalization by source chain, live latency (1.78 s vs 12.57 s); Solana leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency (1.2 min vs 24.5 min) and Fastest LayerZero source chain by end-to-end message delivery (45.45 s vs 1.0 min).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Base logo
Base

Coinbase-operated optimistic rollup on the OP Stack. 2-second sequencer block time, shared bridge with Optimism via the OP Superchain, fastest-growing L2 by TVL since 2024.

Solana logo
Solana

Proof-of-History sequencing combined with Tower BFT consensus. Probabilistic finality at 32 confirmed slots. Slot time around 400 milliseconds.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Base vs Solana: which one is better?

Base and Solana are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Base leads on Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains. Solana leads on Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, Base or Solana?

On the Cheapest blockchain transaction fee, live across 15 L1 and L2 chains benchmark, Base leads at $0.000305 versus Solana at $0.000486. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is faster, Base or Solana?

On the Fastest Chainlink CCIP source chain by end-to-end delivery latency benchmark, Solana leads at 1.2 min (provisional) versus Base at 24.5 min (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Base vs Solana comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.