BullX vs GMGN

Name: BullX vs GMGN OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

GMGN leads on the only live benchmark. GMGN wins on Solana DEX volume ($90.20M vs $181.0K).

Read methodology Last measured Thu, 13 Aug 2026 21:27:35 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

BullX

BullX is a multi-chain trading terminal for memecoins supporting Solana, Ethereum, Base and other EVM chains. It provides token sniping, copy trading, and limit orders with a per-trade platform fee.

GMGN

GMGN is a Solana and EVM memecoin trading terminal combining wallet tracking, smart money copy trading and a Telegram bot. It routes swaps through pump.fun and DEX pools with a configurable slippage and fee.

Side by side measurements

Solana DEX volume: pump.fun vs Axiom vs GMGN vs Fomo, live 24h

Trading

Provider	24h volume	Protocol revenue (24h)	7-day volume	Take rate
BullX	$181.0K	$13	$1.78M	0.00007%
GMGN	$90.20M	$586.7K	$565.60M	0.0065%

Volume and revenue data sourced from DeFiLlama's DEX and fees APIs. DeFiLlama attributes volume via on-chain referral tags and program IDs; platforms without standard tags may be undercounted. Figures are 24-hour and 7-day rolling totals updated every 30 minutes. Revenue uses DeFiLlama's dailyRevenue dataType, stripping LP fees. Terminal volume (Axiom, GMGN, Fomo) and launchpad volume (pump.fun) use different attribution methods and are not directly additive.

Frequently asked questions

BullX vs GMGN: which one is better?

BullX and GMGN are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. GMGN leads on Solana DEX volume. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is cheaper, BullX or GMGN?

On the Solana DEX volume benchmark, GMGN leads at $90.20M versus BullX at $181.0K. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the BullX vs GMGN comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing — panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.