AlternativesSourced from Best wallet labeling API provider
Dune alternatives
SQL-based analytics on indexed onchain data
Dune lets analysts query indexed blockchain data with SQL, often via labelled wallet datasets contributed by the community. When sizing alternatives, one practical axis is wallet labelling depth. how many addresses does each provider have a label for, and how confident are those labels? Below is the live coverage from each major labelling provider, refreshed continuously against a shared sample of recently active wallets.
Positioning
Dune runs two distinct product surfaces with different pipelines. The core Dune Analytics product exposes SQL over decoded blockchain tables (Trino-backed, dbt-integrated), where community-maintained Spellbook models sit on top of raw, decoded, and traces tables. The Sim API is the real-time product, positioned in the docs as covering more than 60 EVM chains plus Solana and Eclipse with a REST surface for Balances, Activity, Transactions, Token Info, Token Holders, DeFi Positions, Collectibles and Webhooks. For a wallet-labels-coverage benchmark, the load-bearing distinction is that entity labels historically live in Dune Analytics as SQL tables and community spells rather than as a single REST endpoint on Sim; the Sim quickstart categorizes its endpoints around balances, activity, and token info, not wallet identity. Coverage of labels is therefore a function of what analysts have committed to the Spellbook plus what Sim exposes through its search and metadata endpoints. Teams pick Dune when the workflow is analyst-driven and labels are consumed via SQL joins in dashboards. Teams migrate when a product needs a single low-latency REST call that returns "is this address a CEX, MEV bot, bridge, or protocol contract" without writing a SQL query first.
About Dune: dune.com
Top 5 Dune alternatives
| Product | p50 | Trend | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | № | 24h | |||||
| 01 | 80.1% | ||||||
| 02 | 79.7% | ||||||
| 03 | 50.7% | ||||||
| 04 | 50.4% | ||||||
| 05 | 45.2% | ||||||
| 06 | 44.2% | ||||||
| 07 | 35.7% | ||||||
| 08 | 19.9% | ||||||
- Best
- 80.1 %
- Median
- 45.2 %
- Worst
- 0 %
- Spread
- -
- Samples · 24h
- 22,6179 providers
Coverage rate · last 24 hours
Coverage rate · last 24 hours
Show
Interactive bar chart, distribution view, per-chain drilldowns and chart export on the benchmark page.
Open benchmarkMeasurements sourced from Best wallet labeling API provider. Methodology and raw data on the benchmark page.