Trading platform leaderboard: what GMGN, Axiom, FOMO and Terminal route and what they charge
Routed swap volume per trading app and Telegram bot on its latest closed UTC day, every chain summed, next to the commission the app itself collected on that volume and the take rate the two imply. From DeFiLlama's open dexs and fees adapters.
TL;DR. As of , Axiom leads 24h volume at $150.86M (24h) across 6 ranked providers. Source: OpenChainBench, https://openchainbench.com/benchmarks/solana-trading-platform-wars.
Read this carefully
Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama dexs adapter attributes to it per UTC day, over every chain that adapter covers. Commission is the app's own cut from its fees adapter (dailyRevenue), not the total fees paid on the trade: the venue underneath takes its own share, and counting that would roughly double the figure. The take rate divides the two over the same days, so it is a floor where an adapter covers fewer chains for fees than for volume. Rows end on each app's own latest closed day.
A trading app is a router. It does not settle a trade, it sends it to pump.fun, Raydium, PancakeSwap or a Robinhood Chain pool and takes a cut on the way, so the two numbers that describe it are the volume it routed and the commission it kept. This benchmark puts them side by side for the majors, on closed UTC days, from DeFiLlama's open adapters. Axiom leads on routed volume at $150.86M, and the take rate column is where the apps separate: a terminal charging around 1% of a smaller book can out-earn one routing several times the volume at half that. FOMO settles cross-chain trades through Relay and books them on Solana, so its volume is its whole business rather than a Solana slice. For the wider fourteen-app cohort with the per-chain split and a year of daily history, read bench 267.
Methodology
The trading-app-volume harness reads DeFiLlama's free summary endpoints once an hour: /summary/dexs/<slug>?dataType=dailyVolume for routed volume with its per-chain split, and /summary/fees/<slug>?dataType=dailyRevenue for the app's own commission, both on UTC day buckets. The open day is dropped. Each app's figures end on its own latest closed day, because most adapters are Dune queries that publish a day 10 to 20 hours after it closes. The harness exposes trading_app_volume_usd, trading_app_revenue_usd, trading_app_take_rate_pct and trading_app_health per app and window. The take rate is computed over the days that have both legs, so a fees adapter running a day behind the volume one cannot read as a lower cut.
Results: 6 providers ranked by 24h volume (24h)
Frequently asked
Which trading app routes the most volume?
Axiom leads at $150.86M on its latest closed UTC day. The order of the top three changes from one day to the next rather than settling, and each row ends on that app's own latest closed day because DeFiLlama's adapters publish at different hours. Read it as a day, not as an intraday ticker: claims that one app has overtaken another are usually a single day or a single metric.
Is the fee column what a trade costs me?
No. It is the app's own commission, DeFiLlama's dailyRevenue, which is the cut the app keeps. A trade also pays the venue underneath, so the total the trader pays is higher: for most of these apps the fees series is about twice the revenue series. The take rate here is what the app earns per dollar routed, not the all-in cost of a swap.
Why did the numbers change on 2026-09-27?
The source changed. This bench read eight uploaded Dune datasets that stopped updating on 2026-08-25 and were served as current for 32 days. It now reads DeFiLlama's open adapters. For the apps that trade mainly on Solana the two agree closely, Trojan within 0.1% and Terminal within 1.4% on 2026-09-26, but GMGN and FOMO read much higher here because this counts every chain and every cross-chain leg rather than the Solana slice.
How is this different from bench 267?
Bench 267 is the same volume series over a wider cohort of fourteen apps, with the per-chain breakdown, share of the cohort and a year of daily history. This bench is the seven majors with the commission and take rate alongside, which is the part that says which of them is the larger business rather than the larger router.
What is the difference between GMGN and Axiom?
Both are web trading terminals aimed at active traders. GMGN leans on wallet analysis and copy trading and runs on ten chains, with most of its volume outside Solana. Axiom is a terminal focused on chart speed and order execution across Solana, BSC and Robinhood Chain. Both route into the same underlying pools.
Why is BasedBot not in the table?
It has no dexs adapter and no fees adapter on DeFiLlama, and no published fee wallet list anywhere else, so there is nothing to attribute its volume from. It carried no figure under the previous source either, and it left the table when the source changed rather than staying as a permanently blank row.
Where does the pump.fun row come from?
DeFiLlama's pump.fun mobile app adapter, which attributes trades placed through the official app. The launchpad's own bonding-curve volume is a separate and much larger series, and a trade on a pump.fun token routed through GMGN or Axiom counts under those apps rather than here.
Source code github.com/ChainBench/OpenChainBench/tree/main/harnesses/dune-platform-volume