FOMO vs GMGN

FOMO leads on all 5 live benchmarks. FOMO wins on Trading platform leaderboard ($103.95M vs $34.98M), iOS App Store rating (4.80x vs 3.63x), Solana DEX volume ($165.18M vs $33.60M), Trading app daily volume 2026 ($209.66M vs $84.94M). Data as of 2026-09-27 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h5 shared benchmarks
FOMO logo
FOMO

FOMO is a multi-chain trading app (Solana, Base, BNB Chain, and more) for memecoins and perps. It provides social copy-trading, onchain signals, and routes swaps through pump.fun, Raydium, and other DEX pools.

GMGN logo
GMGN

GMGN is a Solana and EVM memecoin trading terminal combining wallet tracking, smart money copy trading and a Telegram bot. It routes swaps through pump.fun and DEX pools with a configurable slippage and fee.

Side by side measurements

Trading platform leaderboard: what GMGN, Axiom, FOMO and Terminal route and what they charge

Trading

FOMO

Leads

$103.95M

p99
$103.95M
rank
#2
samples
103,950,000

GMGN

Trails

$34.98M

p99
$34.98M
rank
#3
samples
34,983,900
24h volume
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama dexs adapter attributes to it per UTC day, over every chain that adapter covers. Commission is the app's own cut from its fees adapter (dailyRevenue), not the total fees paid on the trade: the venue underneath takes its own share, and counting that would roughly double the figure. The take rate divides the two over the same days, so it is a floor where an adapter covers fewer chains for fees than for volume. Rows end on each app's own latest closed day.

Crypto trading app iOS App Store ratings, live

Trading
ProviderApp Store ratingReview count
FOMO4.80x22.0K
GMGNprovisional3.63x95
View
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Ratings reflect the current all-time average user rating from the Apple App Store as returned by the iTunes lookup API. Apple does not expose star-distribution breakdowns or time-windowed averages via the public API. A high rating with few reviews carries more statistical uncertainty than the same rating with tens of thousands of reviews. The review count column shows how many users contributed to each rating.

Solana DEX volume: pump.fun vs Axiom vs GMGN vs Fomo, live 24h

Trading
Provider24h volumeProtocol revenue (24h)7-day volume
FOMO$165.18M$680.3K$1.01B
GMGN$33.60M$307.3K$154.24M
View
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Volume and revenue from DeFiLlama's DEX and fees APIs, 24h and 7d totals refreshed every 30 minutes. Terminal volume is a floor: a swap counts only when its transaction pays the terminal's fee wallet and Dune decodes the venue. Revenue (dailyRevenue, LP fees stripped) counts every fee reaching those wallets. Their ratio is a take rate this bench does not rank on: it moves threefold across a fortnight for one app. Bench 201 publishes it daily. Terminal and launchpad volume are not additive.

Trading app daily volume 2026: GMGN, Axiom, FOMO, Terminal, Photon, Trojan by UTC day, every chain

Trading
ProviderDaily volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
FOMO$209.66M$7.75B42.5%
GMGN$84.94M$6.64B36.4%
View
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama adapter attributes to the app per UTC day, over every chain the adapter covers: FOMO is Solana only on DeFiLlama, GMGN spans ten chains. Each row ends on the app's latest closed day: most adapters are Dune queries that publish a day 10 to 20 hours after it closes, so before mid-day UTC some rows are dated one day behind, and GMGN's adapter skips some days. DeFiLlama can restate the last day for about a day; the series is re-read hourly.

Trading terminal fill quality 2026: what a swap costs on Axiom, GMGN, FOMO, Photon, Trojan, measured on-chain

Trading
ProviderCost per swapTerminal feeNetworkPoolFailed swaps
FOMO337 bps129 bps25.6 bps59.0 bps7.49%
GMGN345 bps99.0 bps25.8 bps92.7 bps1.82%
View
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Random sample (150 a day per row, Solana and EVM alike) of the swaps each terminal routed, every attempt counted for the fail rate. Reference = the pool's state before the swap (its reserves, or the previous trade within 60 s); swaps without one keep their split, no loss figure. Published from 50 priced swaps pooled over the product's chains at 25 or more (a single-chain product from 25), ranked from 100; the median's 95 % interval is in the JSON. Compare medians, not single swaps.

Frequently asked questions

FOMO vs GMGN: which one is better?

FOMO and GMGN are compared on 5 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. FOMO leads on Trading platform leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher 24h volume, FOMO or GMGN?

On the Trading platform leaderboard benchmark, FOMO leads at $103.95M versus GMGN at $34.98M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the FOMO vs GMGN comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.