FOMO vs GMGN

FOMO leads on all 9 live benchmarks. FOMO wins on Trading terminal leaderboard ($41.35M vs $22.28M), iOS App Store rating (4.80x vs 4.31x), Memecoin trading fees (0.49% vs 1.04%), Average swap size per trading terminal ($63.51 vs $57.39). Data as of 2026-11-13 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h9 shared benchmarks
FOMO logo
FOMO

FOMO is a multi-chain trading app (Solana, Base, BNB Chain, and more) for memecoins and perps. It provides social copy-trading, onchain signals, and routes swaps through pump.fun, Raydium, and other DEX pools.

GMGN logo
GMGN

GMGN is a Solana and EVM memecoin trading terminal combining wallet tracking, smart money copy trading and a Telegram bot. It routes swaps through pump.fun and DEX pools with a configurable slippage and fee.

Side by side measurements

Trading terminal leaderboard: what GMGN, Axiom, Fomo and Terminal route and what they charge

Trading

Headline: All chains

ProviderDaily volumeVolume 7dVolume 30dFee revenueFee revenue 7dFee revenue 30dTake rateTake rate 7dTake rate 30d
FOMO$41.35M$328.55M$1.56B$203.8K$1.47M$7.54M0.49%0.45%0.48%
GMGN$22.28M$163.84M$825.76M$232.6K$1.72M$8.56M1.04%1.05%1.04%
View
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Volume routed through each terminal's own interface, not volume on the tokens it trades: a swap on a pump.fun token executed through Axiom counts for Axiom here and for pump.fun on bench 200. From the public tehcscreener API, which is Allium-backed. Fee revenue is what the source reports as fees, which is more than the terminal's own commission; bench 203 explains what that is and is not.

Last complete UTC day · Daily volumeRaw JSON

Crypto trading app iOS App Store ratings, live

Trading
ProviderApp Store ratingReview count
FOMO4.80x27.3K
GMGN4.31x192
View
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Ratings reflect the current all-time average user rating from the Apple App Store as returned by the iTunes lookup API. Apple does not expose star-distribution breakdowns or time-windowed averages via the public API. A high rating with few reviews carries more statistical uncertainty than the same rating with tens of thousands of reviews. The review count column shows how many users contributed to each rating.

Memecoin terminal take rates: what Terminal, Trojan, GMGN and pump.fun keep

Trading

Headline: All chains

FOMO

Leads

0.49 %

p99
0.49%
rank
#2
samples
203,760

GMGN

Trails

1.04 %

p99
1.04%
rank
#6
samples
232,618

Per chain

ChainFOMOGMGN
Solana0.52%1.08%
BNB Chain0.33%1.00%
Robinhood Chain0.34%1.00%
Base0.29%1.00%
Arc0.43%1.00%
Ethereum0.43%1.01%
Observed take rate
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

One complete UTC day's fee revenue divided by that day's routed volume, from the public tehcscreener API, which is Allium-backed. What the terminal kept, a lower bound on what it charges: waivers and rebates pull it down. A cell reading zero is withheld rather than ranked whenever that platform charges on another chain, because this page cannot tell a waived fee from an unmeasured one. Not the all-in cost of a swap, which also includes slippage; benches 268 and 279 measure that.

Last complete UTC day · Observed take rateRaw JSON

Average swap size per trading terminal: who carries the biggest tickets

Trading

Headline: All chains

FOMO

Leads

$63.51

p99
$63.51
rank
#2
samples
651,012

GMGN

Trails

$57.39

p99
$57.39
rank
#3
samples
388,287

Per chain

ChainFOMOGMGN
Solana$59.79$49.75
BNB Chain$62.35$61.31
Robinhood Chain$144.41$78.32
Base$145.74$110.71
Arc$107.49$12.87
Ethereum$1,098.11$179.58
Avg swap size
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Average swap size is one complete UTC day's routed volume divided by that day's swap count, on the chain the tab names or across all of them. From the public tehcscreener API, which is Allium-backed. Both figures include bot and MEV activity. A mean, not a median, so a handful of large tickets moves it and this is not the typical trade. Larger is not better in any product sense; it describes who the terminal serves.

Last complete UTC day · Avg swap sizeRaw JSON

Daily swap transactions per trading terminal: Axiom vs Fomo vs pump.fun vs GMGN

Trading

Headline: All chains

FOMO

Leads

651.0K

p99
651.0K
rank
#3
samples
41,347,700

GMGN

Trails

388.3K

p99
388.3K
rank
#4
samples
22,284,900

Per chain

ChainFOMOGMGN
Solana605.3K219.7K
BNB Chain24.1K137.4K
Robinhood Chain11.2K13.5K
Base3,8794,191
Arc73926
Ethereum6802,200
Swap transactions 24h
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Transaction counts for one complete UTC day, on the chain the tab names or summed across all of them, from the public tehcscreener API, which is Allium-backed. Counts transactions, not wallets: bench 232 counts the distinct wallets behind them, and the ratio between the two pages is a measure of automation. Bots, MEV searchers and multi-wallet traders are all included.

Last complete UTC day · Swap transactions 24hRaw JSON

Daily active wallets per trading terminal: Fomo vs Axiom vs pump.fun vs GMGN

Trading

Headline: Solana only

ProviderActive wallets 24hSwaps per walletVolume per wallet
FOMO56.0K11$645.99
GMGN11.2K20$975.20
View
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Distinct wallets per chain for one complete UTC day, from the public tehcscreener API, which is Allium-backed. A wallet that used two terminals is counted in each, so the columns are not mutually exclusive, and bots, MEV searchers and multi-wallet traders are all included. A wallet is not a person. Counts are per chain and never summed across chains: the source's own cross-chain deduplication runs about 0.6 of the per-chain sum, so adding the tabs would overstate every terminal.

Last complete UTC day · Active wallets 24hRaw JSON

Trading app daily volume: GMGN, Axiom, Fomo, Terminal, Photon, Trojan by UTC day

Trading

Headline: All chains

ProviderDaily volumeVolume 7dVolume 30dShareShare 7dShare 30dChains reachedDays of history
FOMO$41.35M$328.55M$1.56B24.8%27.0%26.5%8652
GMGN$22.28M$163.84M$825.76M13.4%13.5%14.0%101,196
View
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Routed volume for one complete UTC day, from the public tehcscreener API, which is Allium-backed. Six apps left this cohort on 2026-10-07 because the source does not cover them: BonkBot, Banana Gun, Bloom, Sol Trading Bot, PepeBoost and o1.exchange. An app that cannot be measured is removed rather than published as zero.

Last complete UTC day · Daily volumeRaw JSON

Trading terminal fill quality 2026: what a swap costs on Axiom, GMGN, FOMO, Photon, Trojan, measured on-chain

Trading

Headline: All chains

ProviderCost per swapTerminal feeNetworkPoolFailed swaps
FOMO347 bps180 bps12.7 bps114 bps1.05%
GMGN348 bps98.9 bps17.3 bps127 bps2.05%
View
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Random sample (1,000 a day per Solana row, 6,000 per EVM row) of the swaps each terminal routed, every attempt counted for the fail rate. Reference = the pool's state before the swap (its reserves, or the previous trade within 60 s); swaps without one keep their split, no loss figure. Published from 50 priced swaps pooled over the product's chains at 25 or more (a single-chain product from 25), ranked from 100; the median's 95 % interval is in the JSON. Compare medians, not single swaps.

Trading terminal execution quality 2026: what a swap costs once the app's own fee is removed

Trading

Headline: All chains

ProviderExecution lossCost per swap, all inApp feeNetworkPool
FOMO162 bps347 bps180 bps12.7 bps114 bps
GMGN251 bps348 bps98.9 bps17.3 bps127 bps
View
FOMOn/aGMGNn/a

Same sample, window and reference as bench 268; read that page for how a swap is priced. Here each swap's loss has the terminal's fee subtracted before the median is taken. Subtracting the two published medians gives a different number wherever an app's fee varies across its own swaps, which is why this is measured, not derived. A swap reads negative when a fee was rebated or the reference drifted the user's way; those stay in. Compare medians with their intervals, never single swaps.

Frequently asked questions

FOMO vs GMGN: which one is better?

FOMO and GMGN are compared on 9 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. FOMO leads on Trading terminal leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher daily volume, FOMO or GMGN?

On the Trading terminal leaderboard benchmark, FOMO leads at $41.35M versus GMGN at $22.28M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the FOMO vs GMGN comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.