FOMO vs Invo 2026: 2 live benchmarks compared

Name: FOMO vs Invo OpenChainBench measurements
Creator: OpenChainBench
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

OpenChainBench

FOMO vs Invo

FOMO leads on both live benchmarks. FOMO wins on Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard ($15.6K vs $1,534.69), iOS App Store rating (4.80x vs 4.24x). Data as of 2026-10-11 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Sun, 11 Oct 2026 05:37:31 UTCWindow: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks

FOMO

FOMO is a multi-chain trading app (Solana, Base, BNB Chain, and more) for memecoins and perps. It provides social copy-trading, onchain signals, and routes swaps through pump.fun, Raydium, and other DEX pools.

Invo

Invo is a Hyperliquid-powered social trading mobile app supporting 170+ perp pairs with copy-trading and a registered builder code (Hyperliquid referral code INVO, 25k+ referrals).

Side by side measurements

Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard

Trading

Provider	Builder fees collected	Volume routed	Users 24h	Effective fee bps
FOMO	$15.6K	$34.32M	1,078	0.046%
Invo	$1,534.69	$4.38M	3,047	0.035%

View

FOMOn/aInvon/a

Ranking is by raw builder fee revenue in USD, not by value for users. Bigger number means more fees collected via the on-chain builder code field. For the trader cost perspective, switch to the Effective fee bps companion tab. Native Hyperliquid UI orders carry no builder code and are excluded. Figures describe the last complete UTC day published on Hyperliquid's builder fills feed, so they run 3 to 27 hours behind the chain.

Crypto trading app iOS App Store ratings, live

Trading

Provider	App Store rating	Review count
FOMO	4.80x	24.3K
Invo	4.24x	459

View

FOMOn/aInvon/a

Ratings reflect the current all-time average user rating from the Apple App Store as returned by the iTunes lookup API. Apple does not expose star-distribution breakdowns or time-windowed averages via the public API. A high rating with few reviews carries more statistical uncertainty than the same rating with tens of thousands of reviews. The review count column shows how many users contributed to each rating.

Frequently asked questions

FOMO vs Invo: which one is better?

FOMO and Invo are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. FOMO leads on Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher builder fees collected, FOMO or Invo?

On the Hyperliquid frontends builder revenue leaderboard benchmark, FOMO leads at $15.6K versus Invo at $1,534.69. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the FOMO vs Invo comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Related comparisons

FOMO vs pump.fun

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.