FOMO leads on all 3 live benchmarks. FOMO wins on Trading platform leaderboard ($103.95M vs $22.48M), Trading app daily volume 2026 ($209.66M vs $22.16M), Trading terminal fill quality 2026 (336 bps vs 446 bps). Data as of 2026-09-27 UTC.
Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
FOMO is a multi-chain trading app (Solana, Base, BNB Chain, and more) for memecoins and perps. It provides social copy-trading, onchain signals, and routes swaps through pump.fun, Raydium, and other DEX pools.
Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama dexs adapter attributes to it per UTC day, over every chain that adapter covers. Commission is the app's own cut from its fees adapter (dailyRevenue), not the total fees paid on the trade: the venue underneath takes its own share, and counting that would roughly double the figure. The take rate divides the two over the same days, so it is a floor where an adapter covers fewer chains for fees than for volume. Rows end on each app's own latest closed day.
Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama adapter attributes to the app per UTC day, over every chain the adapter covers: FOMO is Solana only on DeFiLlama, GMGN spans ten chains. Each row ends on the app's latest closed day: most adapters are Dune queries that publish a day 10 to 20 hours after it closes, so before mid-day UTC some rows are dated one day behind, and GMGN's adapter skips some days. DeFiLlama can restate the last day for about a day; the series is re-read hourly.
Random sample (150 a day per row, Solana and EVM alike) of the swaps each terminal routed, every attempt counted for the fail rate. Reference = the pool's state before the swap (its reserves, or the previous trade within 60 s); swaps without one keep their split, no loss figure. Published from 50 priced swaps pooled over the product's chains at 25 or more (a single-chain product from 25), ranked from 100; the median's 95 % interval is in the JSON. Compare medians, not single swaps.
Frequently asked questions
FOMO vs Terminal: which one is better?
FOMO and Terminal are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. FOMO leads on Trading platform leaderboard. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h volume, FOMO or Terminal?
On the Trading platform leaderboard benchmark, FOMO leads at $103.95M versus Terminal at $22.48M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the FOMO vs Terminal comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.
