Axiom leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks, GMGN on 1. Axiom wins on Trading platform leaderboard ($150.86M vs $34.98M), Solana DEX volume ($150.83M vs $33.60M), Trading app daily volume 2026 ($157.78M vs $84.94M). GMGN wins on Trading terminal fill quality 2026 (345 bps vs 430 bps). Data as of 2026-09-27 UTC.
Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Axiom is a Solana-native trading terminal expanding to Hyperliquid perps with a registered builder code, focused on advanced order types and pro-trader UX.
GMGN is a Solana and EVM memecoin trading terminal combining wallet tracking, smart money copy trading and a Telegram bot. It routes swaps through pump.fun and DEX pools with a configurable slippage and fee.
Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama dexs adapter attributes to it per UTC day, over every chain that adapter covers. Commission is the app's own cut from its fees adapter (dailyRevenue), not the total fees paid on the trade: the venue underneath takes its own share, and counting that would roughly double the figure. The take rate divides the two over the same days, so it is a floor where an adapter covers fewer chains for fees than for volume. Rows end on each app's own latest closed day.
Volume and revenue from DeFiLlama's DEX and fees APIs, 24h and 7d totals refreshed every 30 minutes. Terminal volume is a floor: a swap counts only when its transaction pays the terminal's fee wallet and Dune decodes the venue. Revenue (dailyRevenue, LP fees stripped) counts every fee reaching those wallets. Their ratio is a take rate this bench does not rank on: it moves threefold across a fortnight for one app. Bench 201 publishes it daily. Terminal and launchpad volume are not additive.
Volume is what each app's DeFiLlama adapter attributes to the app per UTC day, over every chain the adapter covers: FOMO is Solana only on DeFiLlama, GMGN spans ten chains. Each row ends on the app's latest closed day: most adapters are Dune queries that publish a day 10 to 20 hours after it closes, so before mid-day UTC some rows are dated one day behind, and GMGN's adapter skips some days. DeFiLlama can restate the last day for about a day; the series is re-read hourly.
Random sample (150 a day per row, Solana and EVM alike) of the swaps each terminal routed, every attempt counted for the fail rate. Reference = the pool's state before the swap (its reserves, or the previous trade within 60 s); swaps without one keep their split, no loss figure. Published from 50 priced swaps pooled over the product's chains at 25 or more (a single-chain product from 25), ranked from 100; the median's 95 % interval is in the JSON. Compare medians, not single swaps.
Frequently asked questions
Axiom vs GMGN: which one is better?
Axiom and GMGN are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Axiom leads on Trading platform leaderboard. GMGN leads on Trading terminal fill quality 2026. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h volume, Axiom or GMGN?
On the Trading platform leaderboard benchmark, Axiom leads at $150.86M versus GMGN at $34.98M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is cheaper, Axiom or GMGN?
On the Trading terminal fill quality 2026 benchmark, GMGN leads at 345 bps versus Axiom at 430 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Axiom vs GMGN comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.