Fastest EVM swap quote API
AggregatorsHeadline: All chains
0x
Leads218 ms
- p99
- 458 ms
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 3,414
Route
Trails272 ms
- p99
- 1.02 s
- rank
- —
- samples
- 716
Quote latency
0xn/aRouten/a
0x vs Route
Split decision: 0x leads on Fastest EVM swap quote API (218 ms vs 272 ms); Route leads on Best DEX aggregator by quote output (0.35 bps vs 18.5 bps). Data as of 2026-10-22 UTC.
0X
Route
Swap router for Robinhood Chain, chain ID 4663, and no other chain. route.fun is the swap interface; the partner API quotes and builds a swap in one request and is key-gated.
Side by side measurements
Best DEX aggregator by quote output: who actually gives you more
AggregatorsHeadline: All chains
0x
Trails18.5 bps
- p99
- 26.4 bps
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 3,414
Route
Leads0.35 bps
- p99
- 10.5 bps
- rank
- —
- samples
- 715
Quote shortfall
0xn/aRouten/a
Every provider is asked for the same swap at the same second, and each answer is scored against the best of that round. The figure is how much less you would have received, in basis points. Quotes are not comparable between rounds: the market moves 30 to 37 bps in five minutes while the field sits inside 25. Two providers take a fee out of the quote and declare it, shown separately: giving up 25 bps to a toll is not routing badly.
Frequently asked questions
0x vs Route: which one is better?
0x and Route are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. 0x leads on Fastest EVM swap quote API. Route leads on Best DEX aggregator by quote output. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which is faster, 0x or Route?
On the Fastest EVM swap quote API benchmark, 0x leads at 218 ms versus Route at 272 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which is cheaper, 0x or Route?
On the Best DEX aggregator by quote output benchmark, Route leads at 0.35 bps versus 0x at 18.5 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the 0x vs Route comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.