1RPC vs OnFinality

Split decision: 1RPC leads on Starknet RPC endpoints (529 ms vs 800 ms); OnFinality leads on Astar Network RPC endpoints (49 ms vs 170 ms). Data as of 2026-10-05 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
1RPC logo
1RPC

Privacy-preserving public RPC by Automata Network. Strips client metadata before forwarding to upstream node operators; load-balanced across providers.

OnFinality logo
OnFinality

Multi-chain infrastructure provider. Public keyless endpoints on 80+ networks with generous daily limits, plus dedicated and API-key tiers.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

1RPC vs OnFinality: which one is better?

1RPC and OnFinality are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. 1RPC leads on Starknet RPC endpoints. OnFinality leads on Astar Network RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster on rpc latency, 1RPC or OnFinality?

On the Starknet RPC endpoints benchmark, 1RPC leads at 529 ms versus OnFinality at 800 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the 1RPC vs OnFinality comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.