Tokenized stock price accuracy, live onchain vs Nasdaq across 6 equities
RWAAAPL
Leads40.3 bps
- p99
- 111 bps
- rank
- #3
- samples
- 1,947
PLTR
Trails61.0 bps
- p99
- 114 bps
- rank
- #5
- samples
- 1,947
AAPL leads on all 4 live benchmarks. AAPL wins on Tokenized stock price accuracy, live onchain vs Nasdaq across 6 equities (40.3 bps vs 61.0 bps), xStocks price accuracy, live onchain vs Nasdaq across 12 equities on Solana (4.65 bps vs 11.3 bps), Tokenized stock weekend drift, how far each equity wanders Friday to Monday (38.1 bps vs 117 bps), Tokenized RWA on Solana, what a $100k sale actually costs (126 bps vs 843 bps). Data as of 2026-10-24 UTC.
Apple tokenized equity measured across issuers on the RWA benchmarks: Robinhood's token on Robinhood Chain (Uniswap v4 vs USDG) and Backed's xStock on Solana (Jupiter executable mid vs USDC), each tracked live against the real market price.
Palantir tokenized equity measured across issuers on the RWA benchmarks: Robinhood's token on Robinhood Chain (Uniswap v4 vs USDG) and Backed's xStock on Solana (Jupiter executable mid vs USDC), each tracked live against the real market price.
AAPL
Leads40.3 bps
PLTR
Trails61.0 bps
AAPL
Leads4.65 bps
PLTR
Trails11.3 bps
AAPL
Leads38.1 bps
PLTR
Trails117 bps
| Provider | Cost of a $100k sale | Cost $1k | Cost $10k | On-chain supply |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 126 bps | 1.57 bps | 5.88 bps | $53.43M |
| PLTR | 843 bps | 0.89 bps | 30.5 bps | $28.61M |
AAPL and PLTR are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. AAPL leads on Tokenized stock price accuracy, live onchain vs Nasdaq across 6 equities. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Tokenized stock price accuracy, live onchain vs Nasdaq across 6 equities benchmark, AAPL leads at 40.3 bps versus PLTR at 61.0 bps. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.