Across leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Across wins on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (305 ms vs 802 ms), Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (0.060% vs 0.36%), Fastest Solana cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (304 ms vs 790 ms). Data as of 2026-10-08 UTC.
Optimistic cross-chain bridge by Risk Labs. Intents are filled by relayers who front liquidity on the destination, repaid from a canonical hub pool. Settlement is typically sub-30 seconds on liquid corridors.
Cross-chain bridge and DEX aggregator. Routes swaps across bridges and liquidity sources via a single API, with EVM and Solana support.
Across
Leads305 ms
LI.FI
Trails802 ms
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | Across | 319 ms | 319 ms |
| LI.FI | 817 ms | 817 ms | |
| Base to Arb | Across | 325 ms | 325 ms |
| LI.FI | 810 ms | 810 ms | |
| Arb to Sol | Across | 220 ms | 220 ms |
| LI.FI | 981 ms | 981 ms |
Across
Leads0.060 %
LI.FI
Trails0.36 %
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sol to Base | Across | 0.010% | 0.010% |
| LI.FI | 0.34% | 0.32% | |
| Base to Arb | Across | 0.011% | 0.11% |
| LI.FI | 0.27% | 0.26% | |
| Arb to Sol | Across | 0.014% | 0.014% |
| LI.FI | 0.29% | 0.30% |
Across
Leads304 ms
LI.FI
Trails790 ms
Per chain · per region
| Chain | Provider | EU-West | Aggregate |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOL to Base | Across | 319 ms | 319 ms |
| LI.FI | 816 ms | 816 ms | |
| SOL to Arbitrum | Across | 284 ms | 284 ms |
| LI.FI | 843 ms | 843 ms |
Across and LI.FI are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Across leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, Across leads at 305 ms versus LI.FI at 802 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.