Across vs Near Intents: which one is better?

Across and Near Intents are compared on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. See the live table on this page for every metric.

How is the Across vs Near Intents comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

Across vs Near Intents

Across vs Near Intents on 1 shared OpenChainBench benchmark, awaiting live measurements.

Read methodology Last measured Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:01:24 UTCWindow: rolling 24h1 shared benchmark

Across

Near Intents

Cross-chain intent layer from NEAR Protocol. The 1Click API runs a solver auction bus, signed quotes are settled by the winning market maker. Quote latency reflects bid arrival, not route search across LPs.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional

Bridges

Across

No data in window

Near Intents

Trails

0.057 %

p99: 0.088%
rank: #1
samples: 11,224

How this pair was selected

A pair is published when all four conditions hold. Both providers run in the same OpenChainBench benchmark for at least seven consecutive days. Each provider has at least 1000 samples in the measurement window. The head to head query has observable third party search demand. Both providers have a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo so the methodology is externally verifiable.