Across vs Squid Router

Squid Router leads on both live benchmarks. Squid Router wins on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking (327 ms vs 342 ms), Cheapest cross-chain bridge for USDC at $300 notional (0.027% vs 0.057%). Data as of 2026-10-26 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Across logo
Across

Optimistic cross-chain bridge by Risk Labs. Intents are filled by relayers who front liquidity on the destination, repaid from a canonical hub pool. Settlement is typically sub-30 seconds on liquid corridors.

Squid Router logo
Squid Router

Cross-chain swap and liquidity routing built on Axelar. The Squid Router API sources routes across EVM chains via Axelar GMP, covering swaps and bridges in a single call.

Side by side measurements

Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking

Bridges

Across

Trails

342 ms

p99
905 ms
rank
#5
samples
2,304

Squid Router

Leads

327 ms

p99
1.59 s
rank
#4
samples
574

Per chain · per region

ChainProviderEU-WestAggregate
Base to ArbAcross355 ms355 ms
Squid Router328 ms328 ms
Quote latency
Acrossn/aSquid Routern/a

Frequently asked questions

Across vs Squid Router: which one is better?

Across and Squid Router are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Squid Router leads on Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Across or Squid Router?

On the Fastest cross-chain bridge quote API, live ms ranking benchmark, Squid Router leads at 327 ms versus Across at 342 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Across vs Squid Router comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.