Aevo vs edgeX

Aevo leads on all 3 live benchmarks. Aevo wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (238 vs 181), Perp DEX capital efficiency (15 vs 3), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.068x vs 1.660x). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h3 shared benchmarks
Aevo logo
Aevo

OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.

edgeX logo
edgeX

StarkEx-settled perp DEX with low taker fees and a documented public REST API.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

Aevo

Leads

15

p99
15
rank
#2
samples
2,880

edgeX

Trails

3

p99
3
rank
#5
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
Aevon/aedgeXn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live

Trading

Aevo

Leads

0.068x

p99
0.082x
rank
#1
samples
2,880

edgeX

Trails

1.660x

p99
1.930x
rank
#13
samples
2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Aevon/aedgeXn/a

The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.

Rolling 24h · Volume / OI (24h)Raw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Aevo vs edgeX: which one is better?

Aevo and edgeX are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aevo leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher active markets, Aevo or edgeX?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Aevo leads at 238 versus edgeX at 181. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aevo vs edgeX comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.