Aevo vs Extended

Aevo leads on 1 of 4 shared benchmarks, Extended on 3. Aevo wins on Perp DEX capital efficiency (15 vs 3). Extended wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($636.69M vs $6.20M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (326 vs 238), Perp DEX daily volume 2026 ($338.03M vs $3.86M).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h4 shared benchmarks
Aevo logo
Aevo

OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.

Extended logo
Extended

Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.

Daily perp volume, head to head

Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.

Bench 266, all venues

7d lead

Extended

$33.8M vs $1.80B

30d lead

Extended

$109M vs $7.40B

Days led, last 30

0 / 30

Aevo / Extended

Current streak

90 days

Extended since Jun 24, 2026

AevoExtended

UTC days, one side per trade

0125M250M375M500MJun 24Sep 21lead

Aevo volume ÷ Extended volume, week by week

The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.

1.9% · week to 21 Sep · median 0.9%

Aevo ÷ Extended, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day

0%50%100%median 1%8 Jun22 Jun6 Jul20 Jul3 Aug17 Aug31 Aug14 Sep21 Sep

15 Sep to 21 Sep

Aevo ÷ Extended1.9%
vs median+1.0pt
= Aevo volume$33.8M
÷ Extended volume$1.80B
WindowAevoExtendedAevo / Extended
Last closed day (Sep 21, 2026)$3.9M$338M1%
Last 7 days$33.8M$1.80B2%
Last 30 days$109M$7.40B1%

Sources: Aevo, Aevo /statistics PERPETUAL daily_volume per UTC day. Extended, Extended exchange/stats/trading per day, Starknet (Ethereum deployment until 2025-12-29), both sides halved. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Sep 21, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.

Side by side measurements

Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live

Trading

Aevo

Leads

15

p99
15
rank
#2
samples
2,880

Extended

Trails

3

p99
3
rank
#8
samples
2,880
Markets per $M TVL
Aevon/aExtendedn/a

TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.

Rolling 24h · Markets per $M TVLRaw JSON

Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled

Trading
ProviderDaily perp volumeVolume 30dShare 30d
Aevo$3.86M$108.66M0.029%
Extended$338.03M$7.40B1.99%
View
Aevon/aExtendedn/a

Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.

Rolling 24h · Daily perp volumeRaw JSON

Frequently asked questions

Aevo vs Extended: which one is better?

Aevo and Extended are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aevo leads on Perp DEX capital efficiency. Extended leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher markets per $m tvl, Aevo or Extended?

On the Perp DEX capital efficiency benchmark, Aevo leads at 15 versus Extended at 3. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aevo or Extended?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Extended leads at $636.69M versus Aevo at $6.20M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aevo vs Extended comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.