Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingAevo
Trails$6.20M
- p99
- $8.51M
- rank
- #23
- samples
- 2,880
Extended
Leads$636.69M
- p99
- $694.32M
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 2,880
Aevo leads on 1 of 4 shared benchmarks, Extended on 3. Aevo wins on Perp DEX capital efficiency (15 vs 3). Extended wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($636.69M vs $6.20M), Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (326 vs 238), Perp DEX daily volume 2026 ($338.03M vs $3.86M).
OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.
Starknet perp DEX (formerly X10) with order book matching and instant withdrawals via STARK proofs.
Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.
7d lead
Extended
$33.8M vs $1.80B
30d lead
Extended
$109M vs $7.40B
Days led, last 30
0 / 30
Aevo / Extended
Current streak
90 days
Extended since Jun 24, 2026
UTC days, one side per trade
Aevo volume ÷ Extended volume, week by week
The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.
1.9% · week to 21 Sep · median 0.9%
Aevo ÷ Extended, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day
15 Sep to 21 Sep
| Aevo ÷ Extended | 1.9% |
| vs median | +1.0pt |
| = Aevo volume | $33.8M |
| ÷ Extended volume | $1.80B |
| Window | Aevo | Extended | Aevo / Extended |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last closed day (Sep 21, 2026) | $3.9M | $338M | 1% |
| Last 7 days | $33.8M | $1.80B | 2% |
| Last 30 days | $109M | $7.40B | 1% |
Sources: Aevo, Aevo /statistics PERPETUAL daily_volume per UTC day. Extended, Extended exchange/stats/trading per day, Starknet (Ethereum deployment until 2025-12-29), both sides halved. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Sep 21, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.
Aevo
Trails$6.20M
Extended
Leads$636.69M
Aevo
Trails238
Extended
Leads326
Aevo
Leads15
Extended
Trails3
TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.
| Provider | Daily perp volume | Volume 30d | Share 30d |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aevo | $3.86M | $108.66M | 0.029% |
| Extended | $338.03M | $7.40B | 1.99% |
Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.
Aevo and Extended are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aevo leads on Perp DEX capital efficiency. Extended leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
On the Perp DEX capital efficiency benchmark, Aevo leads at 15 versus Extended at 3. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, Extended leads at $636.69M versus Aevo at $6.20M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.