Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingAevo
Trails$1.74M
- p99
- $2.09M
- rank
- #23
- samples
- 2,880
GMX
Leads$35.89M
- p99
- $38.63M
- rank
- #20
- samples
- 2,880
24h perp volume
Aevon/aGMXn/a
Aevo vs GMX
Aevo leads on 1 of 3 shared benchmarks, GMX on 2. Aevo wins on Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.068x vs 0.669x). GMX wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($35.89M vs $1.74M), Perp DEX daily volume 2026 ($34.04M vs $1.83M). Data as of 2026-10-06 UTC.
Aevo
OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.
GMX
Perp DEX on Arbitrum and Avalanche. Pool-based execution against GLP and GM vaults, oracle-priced trades with no orderbook.
Daily perp volume, head to head
Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.
7d lead
GMX
$23.2M vs $223M
30d lead
GMX
$118M vs $1.39B
Days led, last 30
0 / 30
Aevo / GMX
Current streak
90 days
GMX since Jul 8, 2026
AevoGMX
UTC days, one side per trade
Aevo volume ÷ GMX volume, week by week
The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.
10.4% · week to 5 Oct · median 2.9%
Aevo ÷ GMX, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day
29 Sep to 5 Oct
| Aevo ÷ GMX | 10.4% |
| vs median | +7.5pt |
| = Aevo volume | $23.2M |
| ÷ GMX volume | $223.1M |
| Window | Aevo | GMX | Aevo / GMX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last closed day (Oct 5, 2026) | $1.8M | $34.0M | 5% |
| Last 7 days | $23.2M | $223M | 10% |
| Last 30 days | $118M | $1.39B | 8% |
Sources: Aevo, Aevo /statistics PERPETUAL daily_volume per UTC day. GMX, GMX V2 synthetics squids, marginVolumeUsd (perps only, swaps excluded), Arbitrum + Avalanche + Botanix + MegaETH. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Oct 5, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.
Side by side measurements
Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled
Trading| Provider | Daily perp volume | Volume 30d | Share 30d |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aevo | $1.83M | $117.77M | 0.032% |
| GMX | $34.04M | $1.39B | 0.38% |
View
Aevon/aGMXn/a
Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.
Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live
TradingAevo
Leads0.068x
- p99
- 0.082x
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 2,880
GMX
Trails0.669x
- p99
- 0.720x
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 2,880
Volume / OI (24h)
Aevon/aGMXn/a
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
Frequently asked questions
Aevo vs GMX: which one is better?
Aevo and GMX are compared on 3 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aevo leads on Perp DEX volume to open interest. GMX leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the lower volume / oi (24h), Aevo or GMX?
On the Perp DEX volume to open interest benchmark, Aevo leads at 0.068x versus GMX at 0.669x. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aevo or GMX?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, GMX leads at $35.89M versus Aevo at $1.74M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Aevo vs GMX comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
Related comparisons
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.