Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingAevo
Trails$4.64M
- p99
- $8.27M
- rank
- #23
- samples
- 2,876
GRVT
Leads$489.61M
- p99
- $514.66M
- rank
- #10
- samples
- 2,860
24h perp volume
Aevon/aGRVTn/a
Aevo vs GRVT
Aevo leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks, GRVT on 1. Aevo wins on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (238 vs 194), Perp DEX capital efficiency (15 vs 6), Perp DEX volume to open interest (0.298x vs 1.027x). GRVT wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($489.61M vs $4.64M). Data as of 2026-09-24 UTC.
Aevo
OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.
GRVT
zkSync hybrid CEX/DEX perp venue with privacy-preserving order matching.
Side by side measurements
Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue
TradingAevo
Leads238
- p99
- 238
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 2,876
GRVT
Trails194
- p99
- 194
- rank
- #6
- samples
- 2,876
Active markets
Aevon/aGRVTn/a
Perp DEX capital efficiency: active markets per $M TVL, live
TradingAevo
Leads15
- p99
- 15
- rank
- #2
- samples
- 2,876
GRVT
Trails6
- p99
- 6
- rank
- #4
- samples
- 2,876
Markets per $M TVL
Aevon/aGRVTn/a
TVL from DefiLlama /protocol/{slug} currentChainTvls, excluding staking and pool2 categories. Market count from each venue's native API (same source as the perp-active-markets bench). The ratio reflects architectural choices, not absolute liquidity: a high ratio means the venue can list many markets cheaply, not that each market has deep liquidity. Compare with perp-volume-share for the liquidity angle.
Perp DEX volume to open interest: 24h turnover per dollar of OI, live
TradingAevo
Leads0.298x
- p99
- 0.530x
- rank
- #1
- samples
- 2,876
GRVT
Trails1.027x
- p99
- 1.079x
- rank
- #7
- samples
- 2,860
Volume / OI (24h)
Aevon/aGRVTn/a
The ratio is a screen, not a verdict. Both terms are the venue's own figures (24h volume and open interest as each API reports them, in USD), so a venue that counts both legs of a fill moves its ratio without changing anything real. A very low ratio (Ostium, 0.2x) means positions held for days on thin daily volume; a very high one (Kalshi, above 40x) means a day of trading dwarfs what stays open. The bands in the methodology say what each range usually means.
Frequently asked questions
Aevo vs GRVT: which one is better?
Aevo and GRVT are compared on 4 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aevo leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. GRVT leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher active markets, Aevo or GRVT?
On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Aevo leads at 238 versus GRVT at 194. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aevo or GRVT?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, GRVT leads at $489.61M versus Aevo at $4.64M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Aevo vs GRVT comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.