Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked
TradingAevo
Trails$1.66M
- p99
- $1.89M
- rank
- #22
- samples
- 2,880
ORDER
Leads$24.53M
- p99
- $25.97M
- rank
- #17
- samples
- 2,880
24h perp volume
Aevon/aORDERn/a
Aevo vs ORDER
ORDER leads on both live benchmarks. ORDER wins on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($24.53M vs $1.66M), Perp DEX daily volume 2026 ($25.97M vs $1.51M). Data as of 2026-10-05 UTC.
Aevo
OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.
ORDER
Orderly Network is a permissionless liquidity layer for on-chain perpetuals. Front-ends (including WOOFi Pro) route orders through a shared CLOB infrastructure deployed across Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Base and other chains.
Daily perp volume, head to head
Perpetual notional per closed UTC day, the DeFiLlama day buckets, read from each venue's own data. Ribbon under the bars marks which venue printed more that day.
7d lead
ORDER
$24.1M vs $423M
30d lead
ORDER
$118M vs $1.37B
Days led, last 30
0 / 30
Aevo / ORDER
Current streak
90 days
ORDER since Jul 7, 2026
AevoORDER
UTC days, one side per trade
Aevo volume ÷ ORDER volume, week by week
The ratio of the two venues' seven-day perp volume, in percent; a window is shown only when both sides have every day closed. 100% is parity. The dashed line is the median of the weeks shown; the last window is the 7d tile above.
5.7% · week to 4 Oct · median 5.5%
Aevo ÷ ORDER, seven-day windows ending on the last closed day
28 Sep to 4 Oct
| Aevo ÷ ORDER | 5.7% |
| vs median | +0.2pt |
| = Aevo volume | $24.1M |
| ÷ ORDER volume | $423.3M |
| Window | Aevo | ORDER | Aevo / ORDER |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last closed day (Oct 4, 2026) | $1.5M | $26.0M | 6% |
| Last 7 days | $24.1M | $423M | 6% |
| Last 30 days | $118M | $1.37B | 9% |
Sources: Aevo, Aevo /statistics PERPETUAL daily_volume per UTC day. ORDER, Orderly Network md/volume/daily_stats, all chains. Days where either venue has not closed are left blank rather than counted as zero. Last closed day common to both: Oct 4, 2026. Methodology and every venue on bench 266.
Side by side measurements
Perp DEX daily volume 2026: Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter, GMX, Gains, dYdX by UTC day, backfilled
Trading| Provider | Daily perp volume | Volume 30d | Share 30d |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aevo | $1.51M | $118.01M | 0.033% |
| ORDER | $25.97M | $1.37B | 0.38% |
View
Aevon/aORDERn/a
Volume is self-reported by each venue's public data surface and counted per UTC day, one side of each trade. Perimeters differ slightly per venue and are stated in the ledger notes. A closed day can be restated by a venue for one to two days; the harness re-reads the last three days every hour. Not a measure of organic flow: incentive programs and wash trading inflate notional on every venue.
Frequently asked questions
Aevo vs ORDER: which one is better?
Aevo and ORDER are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. ORDER leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.
Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aevo or ORDER?
On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, ORDER leads at $24.53M versus Aevo at $1.66M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.
How is the Aevo vs ORDER comparison measured?
Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.
How this pair was selected
Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.