Aevo vs StandX

Split decision: Aevo leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue (238 vs 13); StandX leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked ($375.42M vs $7.11M).

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h2 shared benchmarks
Aevo logo
Aevo

OP Stack perp DEX with deep options support, event-driven flow.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Aevo vs StandX: which one is better?

Aevo and StandX are compared on 2 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Aevo leads on Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue. StandX leads on Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which has the higher active markets, Aevo or StandX?

On the Most tradable markets on a perp DEX, live count per venue benchmark, Aevo leads at 238 versus StandX at 13. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which has the higher 24h perp volume, Aevo or StandX?

On the Perp DEX volume share, live 24h notional ranked benchmark, StandX leads at $375.42M versus Aevo at $7.11M. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Aevo vs StandX comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.