Alchemy vs BlockMachine

Alchemy leads on 8 of 9 shared benchmarks, BlockMachine on 1. Alchemy wins on Ethereum RPC endpoints (31 ms vs 297 ms), Arbitrum RPC endpoints (32 ms vs 314 ms), Base RPC endpoints (31 ms vs 324 ms), BNB Chain RPC endpoints (33 ms vs 291 ms). BlockMachine wins on Cheapest RPC provider, priced per workload across 18 ranked providers ($25 vs $125.48). Data as of 2026-10-24 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h9 shared benchmarks
Alchemy logo
Alchemy

Web3 infrastructure provider offering NFT API, RPC nodes, and blockchain data APIs. Multi-chain EVM coverage.

Side by side measurements

Cheapest RPC provider, priced per workload across 18 ranked providers

RPCs
ProviderMonthly cost, dapp mix at 10M requestsEffective cost per 1M requestsBilling units per requestFree tier, requests per month
Alchemyprovisional$125.48$12.55241.26M
BlockMachineprovisional$25$2.50110.0K
View
Alchemyn/aBlockMachinen/a

Published prices, not invoices. Each figure is human-verified against the provider's own pricing page or API and carries the date it was read; the harness re-hashes 23 of those artifacts on a loop to catch an upstream edit. A 30-day month and flat traffic are assumed, the most generous reading. NOWNodes prices in EUR. A provider absent from a cell is not missing data: it has no plan that can serve that workload, usually a cap or a throughput ceiling rather than the price.

Latest value · Monthly cost, dapp mix at 10M requestsRaw JSON

Most requests a free RPC plan buys, across 12 providers

RPCs

Alchemy

Leads

1.26M

rank
#5

BlockMachine

Trails

10.0K

rank
#11
Free allowance
Alchemyn/aBlockMachinen/a

Allowance, not latency and not reliability. A plan that buys the most requests is not thereby the fastest or the most correct; those are measured on the per-chain RPC pages. Published allowances, human-verified against each provider's own pricing page with the date it was read. A free plan is one that costs nothing and renews, so QuickNode's one-month trial is not here. Where a provider publishes a daily cap it is multiplied by 30.

Frequently asked questions

Alchemy vs BlockMachine: which one is better?

Alchemy and BlockMachine are compared on 9 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Alchemy leads on Ethereum RPC endpoints. BlockMachine leads on Cheapest RPC provider, priced per workload across 18 ranked providers. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Alchemy or BlockMachine?

On the Ethereum RPC endpoints benchmark, Alchemy leads at 31 ms versus BlockMachine at 297 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

Which is cheaper, Alchemy or BlockMachine?

On the Cheapest RPC provider, priced per workload across 18 ranked providers benchmark, BlockMachine leads at $25 (provisional) versus Alchemy at $125.48 (provisional). Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Alchemy vs BlockMachine comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.