OpenChainBench

Alchemy vs Dwellir

Alchemy leads on all 8 live benchmarks. Alchemy wins on Ethereum RPC endpoints (29 ms vs 76 ms), Arbitrum RPC endpoints (29 ms vs 96 ms), Base RPC endpoints (27 ms vs 31 ms), BNB Chain RPC endpoints (32 ms vs 76 ms). Data as of 2026-10-14 UTC.

Read methodology Last measured Window: rolling 24h8 shared benchmarks
Alchemy logo
Alchemy

Web3 infrastructure provider offering NFT API, RPC nodes, and blockchain data APIs. Multi-chain EVM coverage.

Dwellir logo
Dwellir

Web3 Foundation grantee running production-grade Substrate infrastructure across globally distributed bare-metal servers. Keyless public gateways on Polkadot, Kusama and every major parachain, plus dedicated node service.

Side by side measurements

Frequently asked questions

Alchemy vs Dwellir: which one is better?

Alchemy and Dwellir are compared on 8 shared OpenChainBench benchmarks. Alchemy leads on Ethereum RPC endpoints. See the live table on this page for every metric.

Which is faster, Alchemy or Dwellir?

On the Ethereum RPC endpoints benchmark, Alchemy leads at 29 ms versus Dwellir at 76 ms. Live measurement is updated continuously by the OpenChainBench harness.

How is the Alchemy vs Dwellir comparison measured?

Every benchmark on this page uses the same open methodology, published at https://openchainbench.com/methodology. Data is CC-BY-4.0. Measurement harnesses are MIT-licensed.

How this pair was selected

Auto-generated pairs require: both providers in the same benchmark for seven consecutive days, at least 1000 samples per provider, observable third-party search demand, and a public /products/[slug] page on OCB. Editorially curated pairs (like this one) may publish early when search demand is high and data is accruing; panels with fewer than 100 samples are shown as provisional. The full pair ledger is versioned in the public repo.

Live data refreshes via ISR within 60 seconds of a new run. Sources are the same Prometheus queries surfaced on the parent benchmark pages.